494
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 49 points 7 hours ago
[-] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 5 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago)

why not do both? get both efficiencies

[note: this is an example of why i am not currently working in nuclear physics]

[-] Warl0k3@lemmy.world 8 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

That's the most common proposal for MHD generators - once it goes thru the MHD proper you use the waste heat to drive a conventional powerplant. Unfortunately MHD requires the production of plasma to be effective, and plasma just does not like to exist, so the engineering practicalities make it... unlikely to ever be even remotely viable outside of incredibly niche applications (although non-plasma MHD has been studied, and I believe there are even some human trials, to power implants in the body like pacemakers and I remember reading about nervous-interface devices in mice that used arterial MHD on to generate the microcurrent needed)

[-] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 3 points 2 hours ago

ooo, i'm trying to keep up on Deep Brain Stimulation research (i want one for reasons. they aren't doing what i want yet, but in about 5 years they should be there) and that sounds like related research

[-] Warl0k3@lemmy.world 2 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

I'll admit I've been out of the field for a couple years so my information is going to be outdated, but I believe the issue with using MHD for continuous stimulation is that it generates tiny amounts of power - enough to trickle-charge a pacemaker, but not enough to keep tickling the brainstem with the frequency needed in DBS. Hopefully there have been/will be improvements to the tech that I am unaware of!

[-] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 2 points 2 hours ago

huh, so you wouldn't have to plug in and recharge your pace?

[-] Warl0k3@lemmy.world 2 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

I think the idea was to provide a redundant method of charging in case you're unable or forget to recharge it externally. But ideally yes, it would be entirely internally powered so you wouldn't be tethered to the grid.

edit:

A more promising approach is this which is, ~~somewhat unglamorously, just a small turbine implanted into the heart that is spun by bloodflow.~~ oh, no, this is a different study than the one I was thinking of! This uses a flexible generator that generates power from the deformation of the Vena Cava. Fascinating, I'll have to dig thru it.

[-] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 2 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

now that is a novel use of piezoelectricity. whoever thought of that needs many sloppy kisses from many cats

personally i think they just need to design for the battery run at 80% capacity and let it wear down. although i can see why they might need to periodically replace a foreign object implanted in the body. i had to get all the titanium plates and screws removed eventually because ow.

[-] Warl0k3@lemmy.world 2 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

Yeah. Unfortunately even rechargeable pacemakers are extremely rare - almost all of them just expect that you'll have to replace the battery every several years (I think the average is 5?), which in the long run isn't terrible but still. Rechargeable batteries self-discharge far too much and as a result require quite frequent recharging so are far from ideal for implantation, although not having to undergo regular surgery to replace the battery is obviously a highly desirable outcome. The idea with internal power generation is to bridge the gap between the two and allow a person to go for far longer without the need for invasive surgery (there's a whole sidebar here about rechargeable battery chemistry not being ideal for implantation) but without the drawbacks inherent to rechargeable chemistries.

[-] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

our experience was 7, but that was probably more because it was powering a DBS and not an actual pacemaker (i'm guessing lower charge draw over longer period of time) and it was time to implant a probe on the other side of the brain.

[-] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 9 points 3 hours ago

Well, not an engineer myself, either, but generally speaking that would greatly increase the systems complexity, which generally increases maintenance costs, down time, and the initial cost of the system.

You might be able to eke out a bit more power, but there’s more to the decision than total output and how efficient it is.

What I would imagine were a fusion-powered MHD being useful would be as a front end to fusion-based plasma propulsion. (Basically something like the VSIMR, Hall effect or whatever plasma thruster, where the fusion reaction generates both some power to create the thrust and its exhaust plasma is also the reaction mass.(I mentioned I’m not an engineer… right? Just an incorrigible nerd who likes sci-fi.)

[-] GreenCrunch@piefed.blahaj.zone 3 points 2 hours ago

There's a few things (I am an engineer, though not nuclear):

  1. Efficiencies don't necessarily stack like that. For boiling water you're dependent on kinetic energy as heat. I'm not familiar with running plasma through magnetic fields for power generation, but if you lose thermal energy, your overall efficiency may be worse.
  2. In power generation, reliability is obviously extremely important, and the nuclear industry is highly risk-averse. So doing something in a known, tested way is preferable. Any downtime is extremely expensive if things break, since it may be gigawatts of power you're not selling.
  3. Big magnets and handling highly energetic plasma are both really expensive. Steam turbines and generators have existing supply chains since we use them everywhere. I think cost is a big part, since the people building power plants want to make their money back sooner, so may not want to pay millions to billions more for a few percent efficiency gain.
this post was submitted on 26 Mar 2026
494 points (98.8% liked)

Science Memes

19630 readers
1613 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS