124
submitted 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) by BountifulEggnog@hexbear.net to c/technology@hexbear.net

This repository is a backup of that leaked source, and this README is a full breakdown of what's in it, how the leak happened and most importantly, the things we now know that were never meant to be public.


I am not making this up.

Claude Code has a full Tamagotchi-style companion pet system called "Buddy." A deterministic gacha system with species rarity, shiny variants, procedurally generated stats, and a soul description written by Claude on first hatch like OpenClaw.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Hohsia@hexbear.net 26 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

"You are performing a dream - a reflective pass over your memory files. Synthesize what you've learned recently into durable, well-organized memories so that future sessions can orient quickly."

Kinda triggering, are tech bros saying that this is what dreams are?

[-] dat_math@hexbear.net 24 points 1 week ago

If YoU aReN't PrOmPtInG yOuR aGeNtIc CoDiNg ToOl PoEtIcAlLy, HoW dO yOu ExPeCt ThE :beanisbeanis ThAt `LiVeS' iN yOuR cOmMaNd LiNe To OfFeR cReAtIvE iNsIgHtS?

[-] BodyBySisyphus@hexbear.net 36 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Broke: Learning to code
Woke: Becoming a mystical technopriest that elicits code by gaslighting an algorithm.

[-] Dessa@hexbear.net 20 points 1 week ago

I wish we had more taglines like this and fewer that were like "I visited Hexbear once and they insulted my shoes"

[-] NephewAlphaBravo@hexbear.net 16 points 1 week ago

hate to say it but this should also be a tagline

[-] Hermes@hexbear.net 3 points 1 week ago

There was a tagline revision post on the meta comm, unfortunately it was right before the war started so everyone got distracted.

[-] WhatDoYouMeanPodcast@hexbear.net 15 points 1 week ago

I was at a networking event once and a person did have an interesting POV that ever since the first abstraction from binary we've always been trying to communicate with the minerals.

[-] soybeanis@hexbear.net 3 points 1 week ago

communicate with the minerals

did they mean "communicate to other humans using the minerals"? because that I can get behind

but if they meant, "commune with the EM fields and the phonons vibrating around in the crystals by talking to an llm" kitty-cri-screm

They unfortunately meant the latter. The idea being it's a new iteration of the same abstraction going from low level languages to higher ones. Like from Assembly to C to C++ to C#

[-] BodyBySisyphus@hexbear.net 4 points 1 week ago

The thing that has always made that argument sit funky with me is that the LLMs are nondeterministic - as much as people are claiming that output is now crossreferenced and repeatable, my understanding is that there's still a black box issue. I work mainly in R, which is mainly a C wrapper for academics who need to make pretty charts and put asterisks after numbers in tables and don't want to darken the doors of the CS department, and learning the ggplot syntax seems like a less painful lift than patiently explaining in plain English what I want my bar chart to look like (although I guess from my boss's perspective I am basically a less tractable Claude in that sense ohnoes )

[-] soybeanis@hexbear.net 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

nondeterministic

I think the only stochastic piece of the usual llm layout depends on the temperature variable of the last layer. Are there other sources of randomness? Agreed either way they're black boxes

[-] BodyBySisyphus@hexbear.net 1 points 1 week ago

I'm not sure, I haven't really dug into it to see if the code varies meaningfully across similarly-worded requests, but my understanding is that if you write code, the compiler will compile it the same way each time, but if you treat an LLM like an IDE and the prompts as the "code," there might variations over repeated "compilations," leading to drift if you're working on something iteratively.

[-] 30_to_50_Feral_PAWGs@hexbear.net 14 points 1 week ago

Becoming a mystical technopriest that elicits code by gaslighting an algorithm.

This is just polymorphism-via-function-pointers in old-school C

[-] Assian_Candor@hexbear.net 9 points 1 week ago

This but unironically

[-] chgxvjh@hexbear.net 5 points 1 week ago

It's advanced auto complete. If you tell it to write a dream sequence based on information it will do that.

[-] Not_mikey@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 week ago

That's maybe not what dreaming is per say but that is part of the function of sleep. It consolidates short term memory into long term memory, and "cleans up" your short term memory about things that are probably irrelevant going forward.

this post was submitted on 31 Mar 2026
124 points (100.0% liked)

technology

24319 readers
310 users here now

On the road to fully automated luxury gay space communism.

Spreading Linux propaganda since 2020

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS