Image is of a destroyed American AWACS plane in Saudi Arabia, of which there is a very limited supply and each of which is enormously expensive both monetarily and in terms of components. Iran hit this with a precision drone strike that likely cost ~$20,000.
I don't have much to add from the last megathread description. This isn't to say that nothing has happened or has changed since then - decades are still happening in weeks - but the general flow of the war is remaining the same. Trump sometimes threatens to open the Strait with troops and flatten Iran to rubble, and other times threatens that he's gonna back off and let other countries handle it if they really want little trifles like "fuel" and "energy" so much. Iran continues to strike across the Middle East. The West continues to bomb civilian infrastructure due to their relative inability to affect the missile cities. In all: things are generally getting worse for America and the Zionists.
April is the month where the last ships that left Hormuz before it was closed will arrive around the world, so the last month of economic turmoil has been a mere prelude to what's going to occur in the near-future. The silver lining is that Iran appears to be formalizing the new state of affairs in Hormuz, creating a rial-based toll to allow passage between a pair of Iranian-controlled islands where they can be monitored, meaning that, as long as the US doesn't do something exceptionally stupid, the global energy crisis may "only" last a couple years instead of simply being the new reality from now on. Some countries have already agreed to this arrangement, and others will inevitably follow despite their consternation as their economies increasingly suffer.
Last week's thread is here.
The Imperialism Reading Group is here.
Please check out the RedAtlas!
The bulletins site is here. Currently not used.
The RSS feed is here. Also currently not used.
The Zionist Entity's Genocide of Palestine
Sources on the fighting in Palestine against the temporary Zionist entity. In general, CW for footage of battles, explosions, dead people, and so on:
UNRWA reports on the Zionists' destruction and siege of Gaza and the West Bank.
English-language Palestinian Marxist-Leninist twitter account. Alt here.
English-language twitter account that collates news.
Arab-language twitter account with videos and images of fighting.
English-language (with some Arab retweets) Twitter account based in Lebanon. - Telegram is @IbnRiad.
English-language Palestinian Twitter account which reports on news from the Resistance Axis. - Telegram is @EyesOnSouth.
English-language Twitter account in the same group as the previous two. - Telegram here.
Mirrors of Telegram channels that have been erased by Zionist censorship.
Russia-Ukraine Conflict
Examples of Ukrainian Nazis and fascists
Examples of racism/euro-centrism during the Russia-Ukraine conflict
Sources:
Defense Politics Asia's youtube channel and their map. Their youtube channel has substantially diminished in quality but the map is still useful.
Moon of Alabama, which tends to have interesting analysis. Avoid the comment section.
Understanding War and the Saker: reactionary sources that have occasional insights on the war.
Alexander Mercouris, who does daily videos on the conflict. While he is a reactionary and surrounds himself with likeminded people, his daily update videos are relatively brainworm-free and good if you don't want to follow Russian telegram channels to get news. He also co-hosts The Duran, which is more explicitly conservative, racist, sexist, transphobic, anti-communist, etc when guests are invited on, but is just about tolerable when it's just the two of them if you want a little more analysis.
Simplicius, who publishes on Substack. Like others, his political analysis should be soundly ignored, but his knowledge of weaponry and military strategy is generally quite good.
On the ground: Patrick Lancaster, an independent and very good journalist reporting in the warzone on the separatists' side.
Unedited videos of Russian/Ukrainian press conferences and speeches.
Pro-Russian Telegram Channels:
Again, CW for anti-LGBT and racist, sexist, etc speech, as well as combat footage.
https://t.me/aleksandr_skif ~ DPR's former Defense Minister and Colonel in the DPR's forces. Russian language.
https://t.me/Slavyangrad ~ A few different pro-Russian people gather frequent content for this channel (~100 posts per day), some socialist, but all socially reactionary. If you can only tolerate using one Russian telegram channel, I would recommend this one.
https://t.me/s/levigodman ~ Does daily update posts.
https://t.me/patricklancasternewstoday ~ Patrick Lancaster's telegram channel.
https://t.me/gonzowarr ~ A big Russian commentator.
https://t.me/rybar ~ One of, if not the, biggest Russian telegram channels focussing on the war out there. Actually quite balanced, maybe even pessimistic about Russia. Produces interesting and useful maps.
https://t.me/epoddubny ~ Russian language.
https://t.me/boris_rozhin ~ Russian language.
https://t.me/mod_russia_en ~ Russian Ministry of Defense. Does daily, if rather bland updates on the number of Ukrainians killed, etc. The figures appear to be approximately accurate; if you want, reduce all numbers by 25% as a 'propaganda tax', if you don't believe them. Does not cover everything, for obvious reasons, and virtually never details Russian losses.
https://t.me/UkraineHumanRightsAbuses ~ Pro-Russian, documents abuses that Ukraine commits.
Pro-Ukraine Telegram Channels:
Almost every Western media outlet.
https://discord.gg/projectowl ~ Pro-Ukrainian OSINT Discord.
https://t.me/ice_inii ~ Alleged Ukrainian account with a rather cynical take on the entire thing.
came across this maybe interesting article?
America’s War Machine Runs on Tungsten—and It Could Run Out
U.S. operations in Iran risk draining limited U.S. stocks.
Christina Lu
The barrage of munitions that U.S. forces have fired into Iran have laid bare just how reliant the U.S. war machine is on a powerful metal that you’ve likely never heard of: tungsten.
The silvery metal is known for its exceptional density and for having the highest melting point of all pure metals. Those qualities have made it essential for the U.S. defense industry, powering everything from armor-piercing munitions to rocket nozzles.
Tungsten is a “metal of war,” said Chris Berry, the president of House Mountain Partners, an independent metals analysis consultancy.
The problem is that the United States does not mine any tungsten at a commercial scale. And as the widening Middle East conflict enters its second month with no signs of abating, industry analysts and executives warn that U.S. operations are rapidly depleting munitions that are reliant on materials such as tungsten that cannot be immediately replenished or easily replaced.
Tungsten prices have skyrocketed by more than 500 percent in the wake of the conflict.
“We’re getting a very clear picture that there’s just simply not enough tungsten in the supply chain now, and nobody really knows how this shortfall will be made up in the near future,” said Pini Althaus, a managing partner at Cove Capital, a U.S. mining investment firm that plans to build a tungsten mining and processing plant in Kazakhstan in a deal backed by the U.S. government.
As it does with so many of the world’s mineral supply chains, China overwhelmingly commands global tungsten markets, dominating production, imports, and consumption; the United States has lagged behind, relying more on recycling and imports.
The last time that the United States mined any tungsten commercially was more than a decade ago, and U.S. companies are still scrambling to get domestic operations off the ground. And although Washington does stockpile strategic metals, the exact contents of that stockpile are classified.
The tungsten challenge is emblematic of just how reliant the U.S. defense industry is on a raft of metals and minerals, such as rare-earth elements, whose supply chains are largely commanded by China. Shortly before U.S. and Israeli forces struck Iran at the end of February, the U.S. Defense Department reportedly asked mining companies to help reinforce domestic stocks of key minerals, including tungsten, Reuters reported.
That exposure has been thrown into sharp relief in recent months as China has successfully leveraged its rare-earth dominance in trade negotiations with the United States, and analysts warn that the continued depletion of U.S. munitions that rely on these materials could leave Washington in an even more uncertain position ahead of upcoming talks with Beijing.
“If anything, the continued U.S. actions in the Iran war play further into Beijing’s leverage over the U.S. on rare earths,” said Kyle Chan, an expert on China’s industrial policy at the Brookings Institution think tank in Washington.
It “makes this problem that the U.S. had wanted to escape out of almost even more dire,” Chan added, “because now, where are we going to source the yttrium or neodymium or dysprosium that we need for missile systems?”
Even before the Iran war erupted, tungsten prices were already high. After the Trump administration imposed tariffs on multiple tungsten products from China, Beijing responded by unleashing its own export controls on tungsten and other minerals in late 2025—triggering a “desperate situation” in the United States, Althaus said.
With that supply shock, tungsten prices climbed throughout 2025, according to the U.S. Geological Survey. And now, the war in the Middle East—which has only driven up demand for tungsten for weapons systems—has thrown yet another wrench into the mix. Tungsten prices have now “gone parabolic,” Berry said.
“There is a lot of pressure on these materials, and China has cut us off of that access,” said Gracelin Baskaran, the director of the Critical Mineral Security Program at the Center for Strategic and International Studies, a Washington think tank. “You certainly have a situation where the demand being driven by kinetic conflict is leaving us quite precarious.”
For the Trump administration, which has been proactive in securing new critical mineral supply chains, the war in Iran is only set to accelerate ongoing efforts to boost tungsten security. Starting Jan. 1, 2027, Defense Department restrictions on where manufacturers can source tungsten for defense supply chains will officially kick in—part of its bid to cut U.S. reliance on foreign rivals such as China.
At home, the U.S. leader has also unveiled a $12 billion critical mineral stockpile, pumped massive sums of money into domestic mining projects, and taken equity stakes in many private companies. Abroad, the Trump administration has sought mineral partnerships around the world and pitched dozens of countries on a global minerals trading bloc.
With tungsten in particular, the Trump administration has backed and championed an agreement between Cove Capital and the government of Kazakhstan that would see the U.S. firm build a tungsten mining and processing plant in the Central Asian country—relatively unfamiliar territory for American businesses.
When production begins, Washington is set to benefit. “Because we did receive the advocacy from the U.S. government, which helped us secure [the project], we do have a commitment to do the offtakes with the United States and with the U.S. government,” said Althaus of Cove Capital.
The U.S. Defense Department has also awarded $6.2 million to Golden Metal Resources to develop a tungsten project in the U.S. state of Nevada. Golden Metal Resources is a subsidiary of Guardian Metal Resources, which listed on the New York Stock Exchange late last month.
“This is an exciting milestone for Guardian Metal and our team as we begin trading on NYSE American,” said Oliver Friesen, the CEO of Guardian Metal, in a press release. “We believe our Nevada projects are well positioned to contribute to the domestic U.S. tungsten supply amid growing focus on securing critical mineral supply chains.”
For all of this momentum, there are no quick fixes to the immediate tungsten challenge. Engineering new supply chains isn’t just a question of locating new mines; it requires establishing a whole gamut of processing and manufacturing capabilities, all of which require sustained capital—and time.
Berry told Foreign Policy that it will likely take years before the United States will see “a tungsten supply chain or a critical mass of tungsten material that in some way does not touch China.”
Which means that once existing U.S. tungsten stocks are drained, they may stay that way for a while, Althaus said. “It’s extremely difficult to replenish because there simply are not enough mines in production that the U.S. would have access to,” he added. “There are more that are going to come online, but we’re talking about over the next three to 10 years.”
But so long as demand from the Iran war continues to put pressure on the tungsten market, firms are gearing up for even more interest.
“I think there’s a lot of investment dollars that will be going into tungsten in the near future,” Althaus said.
at this point is there any industrial/technological sector that the US is not losing in
It's not just military. Virtually all manufacturing relies on tungsten-carbide cutting tools. These are your turning inserts, endmills, taps and dies. The workhorse for any machining operation on a material harder than aluminum.
Semiconductor manufacturing also depends on tungsten, as it is used as a shield to prevent copper (necessary for connecting front side to back side and back side to the packaging) from infiltrating and destroying the rest of the chip.
I think they're at the forefront of genocide, warcrimes, and human misery.
Wait until you see how much gallium is needed for those big boy radars that Iran blew up.
Didn't these very same tungsten shortages happen to nazi Germany at one point?
I told my guyz we needed to make more tungsten to solve the problem. But they told me they can't. You can't make it. Nobody can make it. It can't be made. It's in the science table chemistry thing. Who knew? Who knew?
Off topic
I'm going to start to read Foreign Policy articles once in a while. Due to their rightwing neoliberal viewpoint - there's an entire vocabulary I never see. It's like learning the language of the enemy. The second paragraph of an article I just started reading:
I never googled "revisionist state" until now. I didn't realize the term has a pro-west, pro-capitalist POV 100% baked in. They might as well say Mordor states.
Wikipedia
Revisionist state is a term from power transition theory within the wider field of international relations. It describes states whose objective is to change or put an end to the current system.The term assumes a direct correlation between a state's hegemony, both political and economic, and its standing as either a status quo state or a revisionist state. Powerful and influential nations in international relations such as the United Kingdom, France and other nations like Japan that are better placed in the world order, are likely to fall under the category of status quo states while Russia, North Korea, Iran and other nations dissatisfied with their place in the international system are termed revisionist states.
Ninja edit
The article actually starts with:
The old world is dying...
“The old world is dying,” Italian philosopher Antonio Gramsci wrote in 1930, “and the new world struggles to be born.” His Marxist convictions notwithstanding, Gramsci would feel at home in the Trumpian age. The old world, in this case, is the international order that the United States built in the West after World War II and then sought to globalize after its victory in the Cold War. That project brought world-changing peace, prosperity, and freedom. Yet today, the old order has run its course.Edit: In case anyone else ran into a pay wall or just doesn't want to give them traffic: https://archive.ph/YAzCl
Sounds like they're just taking leftist terminology and applying it inappropriately to their usual propagandistic narrative. They're literally quoting Gramsci but hedging with "his Marxist convictions notwithstanding." Gramsci was referring to Marxism in that quote you dipshits! It's like saying "Marx's Marxism aside" while talking about Marxist principles.
It's filled with the usual lies that so many of them undoubtedly believe, an attempt at analysis under the given assumption that the US was this great force for peace in the world rather than its primary source of conflict.
Up is down, left is right. Nonsense. You can't reach any meaningful or valid conclusions about the present if you butchered historical reality to that degree. And yet they call Russia and China "revisionist." /spit/
I'm reading another article. I have to be in hate-read mode. If I'm not - their stupid nonsense starts to make me angry. I wonder if every writer at the site is a frustrated novelist. This kind of stuff makes me laugh.
https://redsails.org/concessions obliterates this garbage worldview
doing a lot of heavy lifting there. as long as the great power is just mutilating children at El Mozote, it's fine
Pax Romana but you’re a Celt
"International relations" and "political economy" as western academic fields are even less in line with reality that liberal economics.
China must understand that America cannot be trusted with tungsten
Tung?
https://www.eetimes.com/middle-east-turmoil-materials-shortage-fuel-price-hike-disrupting-chip-industry/
Its not just tungsten lol 😆