This is based on a creative translation of the following sentence. It goes by pretty fast, so it's easy to just notice that it has "preemptive strikes" in it. Does it even make any sense as a thought in English?

We need to launch preemptive strikes so that they know what will happen to them if they use it, and not vice versa.

NATO needs to nuke Russia so Russia will know what happens if Russia uses nukes? That's not even a coherent thought for someone who clearly has a decent grasp of international politics to express. So that leaves the other possibility, that the translator is deliberately fucking with the translation. Which is, of course, exactly what happened.

More here: https://www.newsweek.com/zelensky-nuclear-putin-russia-war-pre-emptive-1749781