126

carbrain is "this is the fault of 3 million parallel, separated, individual actors" a lot

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] 7bicycles@hexbear.net 6 points 2 weeks ago
[-] Acute_Engles@hexbear.net 17 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

I was going to reference the same video to show how an individual CAN in fact affect the flow of traffic for everyone else. One person hitting the brakes causes a chain reaction.

Edit: while I think this video supports my point it's also not indicative of real road conditions. On a highway, being the only car going exactly the posted speed limit is dangerous. The 'flow of traffic' is a real thing. If someone on a narrow bike path with limited visibility decided to get off and walk their bike down the middle of the path, would they not be the problem when people riding their bikes come along and are unable to go around?

[-] 7bicycles@hexbear.net 5 points 2 weeks ago

I was going to reference the same video to show how an individual CAN in fact affect the flow of traffic for everyone else. One person hitting the brakes causes a chain reaction.

okay so what if somebody has to brake because they got cut off or something

[-] Acute_Engles@hexbear.net 10 points 2 weeks ago

The person who changed lanes without enough space/speed caused the traffic jam.

It's a terrible system of transportation and we all want to get off the road as fast as possible.

[-] 7bicycles@hexbear.net 4 points 2 weeks ago

The person who changed lanes without enough space/speed caused the traffic jam.

How's tailgaiting help with this?

[-] Acute_Engles@hexbear.net 8 points 2 weeks ago

Oh, you know, fair. I wasn't focusing on the tailgating aspect. Maintain a safe distance at all time frfr

[-] Abracadaniel@hexbear.net 7 points 2 weeks ago

Or if they were tailgating and had to brake suddenly rather than smoothly because they don't have a large following distance?

[-] spectre@hexbear.net 4 points 2 weeks ago

The person cutting off is most likely the problem.

They need to match speed and merge in where there is space; if you see traffic merging in to your lane, leave space for them (drop speed by ~2 kph) so you don't have to brake.

[-] DornerStan@lemmygrad.ml 2 points 1 week ago

If your driving philosophy assumes everyone is always gonna merge safely, you're gonna be jerking on the brakes a lot, at the very least.

[-] spectre@hexbear.net 3 points 1 week ago

I hardly ever use my brakes on the highway, so idk how to respond to that. A lot of generalizations don't really function anyway due to local driving cultures and infrastructure.

[-] 7bicycles@hexbear.net 5 points 2 weeks ago

thing. If someone on a narrow bike path with limited visibility decided to get off and walk their bike down the middle of the path, would they not be the problem when people riding their bikes come along and are unable to go around?

No, you ride (also drive) only within the visual stopping distance except for very rare circumstances. Also what if that guy just ate shit and is lying unconscious on the ground because of an oil spill?

[-] Acute_Engles@hexbear.net 7 points 2 weeks ago

Also what if that guy just ate shit and is lying unconscious on the ground because of an oil spill?

I would help him

I don't want to torture my hypothetical bicyclist anymore!

[-] 7bicycles@hexbear.net 3 points 2 weeks ago

I would help him

I seriously don't understand how this meshes with your view of the flow of traffic

[-] Acute_Engles@hexbear.net 7 points 2 weeks ago

I have abandoned the metaphor and resorted to being silly since I forgot the original post was about tailgating specifically

[-] Abracadaniel@hexbear.net 3 points 2 weeks ago

If someone on a narrow bike path with limited visibility decided to get off and walk their bike down the middle of the path, would they not be the problem when people riding their bikes come along and are unable to go around?

You're mixing things here. They would not be in the wrong for walking their bike or otherwise traveling a section of limited visibility slowly and with caution. You never know what could be around the corner! In your scenario, they are in the wrong for traveling down the middle and not sticking to the correct side for their jurisdiction.

[-] Acute_Engles@hexbear.net 3 points 2 weeks ago

walking their bike or otherwise traveling a section of limited visibility slowly and with caution.

What if there is fine visibility and no observable reason to be walking your bike?

[-] Abracadaniel@hexbear.net 3 points 1 week ago

If it's a path that also allows pedestrian use then there's still no issue. If it's truly for cycling only the yeah it's a problem and it's incumbent on that person to get out the way, preferably to a sidewalk.

[-] AntiOutsideAktion@hexbear.net 9 points 2 weeks ago

Youtube putting giant recommendation tiles over the entire video at the halfway point peterson-red

[-] 7bicycles@hexbear.net 9 points 2 weeks ago

remember clickable thumbnails in videos and how the removal broke like 90% of videos of 5 years?

[-] AntiOutsideAktion@hexbear.net 8 points 2 weeks ago

Reminds me of that time I tried learning android development and all the functions in the year old tutorial I followed were depreciated

[-] HexReplyBot@hexbear.net 2 points 2 weeks ago

I found a YouTube link in your comment. Here are links to the same video on alternative frontends that protect your privacy:

this post was submitted on 11 May 2026
126 points (99.2% liked)

Chapotraphouse

14372 readers
798 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Slop posts go in c/slop. Don't post low-hanging fruit here.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS