111
submitted 3 days ago by Zerush@lemmy.ml to c/privacy@lemmy.ml
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] WhyJiffie@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 day ago

not only that, but I remember Firefox (maybe chrome too) announcing a few years ago they have made scripted timers less accurate. I think that was a mitigation against websites attempting a spectre/meltdown attack. how is it that this new attack is not affected by the inaccurate timers?

[-] FineCoatMummy@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 hours ago

IDK either. Just guessing here. I'm seeing claims that FF timer precision limiter only happens if you have privacy.resistFingerprinting enabled. Which I try to. But it breaks a shitton of anti-bot access gates and makes them them think I'm a bot, since I'm harder to fingerprint. So I guess many ppl leave resistFingerprinting disabled. Which might let this technique work in full force.

But it sounds like it has to allocate a very large amt of storage. Like 1GB. And then constantly read from that, to make the fingerprint. That's something many ppl would notice. The authors do say there are no known examples of this in the wild. So there's that.

this post was submitted on 28 May 2026
111 points (98.3% liked)

Privacy

48849 readers
192 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS