65
submitted 5 hours ago by git@hexbear.net to c/news@hexbear.net
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] blimthepixie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 21 points 5 hours ago

Probably dressed in typical religious attire?

[-] Evilsandwichman@hexbear.net 7 points 1 hour ago

Considering how the news likes to play with words, it's entirely possible they were wearing clothes that had the Israeli flag on it but the news is choosing to define it as Jewish

[-] git@hexbear.net 24 points 3 hours ago

What does it add to the reporting that “two Jewish guests” doesn’t already?

This is a media criticism angle question - think about why a rag like this would say “visibly” and what emotion that intends to stir. Why does it matter when they’re interacting with a faceless computer system that doesn’t know they’re “visibly Jewish”? Why should we care whether they choose to outwardly express their faith or not? Does it make them more or less worthy “victims”?

And so on.

[-] WalrusDragonOnABike@reddthat.com 14 points 3 hours ago

Maybe they thought hotel staff intentionally assigned them to that room and quickly made that message while they were on the way to their room?

[-] blimthepixie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 40 minutes ago

Maybe every TV in the hotel had the same message and they're doing the typical Israeli thing of playing the victim?

[-] blimthepixie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 13 points 3 hours ago

Because two visibly Rastafari people probably wouldn't be crying about a free Palestine message?

this post was submitted on 06 Jun 2026
65 points (98.5% liked)

news

24780 readers
551 users here now

Welcome to c/news! We aim to foster a book-club type environment for discussion and critical analysis of the news. Our policy objectives are:

We ask community members to appreciate the uncertainty inherent in critical analysis of current events, the need to constantly learn, and take part in the community with humility. None of us are the One True Leftist, not even you, the reader.

Newcomm and Newsmega Rules:

The Hexbear Code of Conduct and Terms of Service apply here.

  1. Link titles: Please use informative link titles. Overly editorialized titles, particularly if they link to opinion pieces, may get your post removed.

  2. Content warnings: Posts on the newscomm and top-level replies on the newsmega should use content warnings appropriately. Please be thoughtful about wording and triggers when describing awful things in post titles.

  3. Fake news: No fake news posts ever, including April 1st. Deliberate fake news posting is a bannable offense. If you mistakenly post fake news the mod team may ask you to delete/modify the post or we may delete it ourselves.

  4. Link sources: All posts must include a link to their source. Screenshots are fine IF you include the link in the post body. If you are citing a Twitter post as news, please include the Xcancel.com (or another Nitter instance) or at least strip out identifier information from the twitter link. There is also a Firefox extension that can redirect Twitter links to a Nitter instance, such as Libredirect or archive them as you would any other reactionary source.

  5. Archive sites: We highly encourage use of non-paywalled archive sites (i.e. archive.is, web.archive.org, ghostarchive.org) so that links are widely accessible to the community and so that reactionary sources don’t derive data/ad revenue from Hexbear users. If you see a link without an archive link, please archive it yourself and add it to the thread, ask the OP to fix it, or report to mods. Including text of articles in threads is welcome.

  6. Low effort material: Avoid memes/jokes/shitposts in newscomm posts and top-level replies to the newsmega. This kind of content is OK in post replies and in newsmega sub-threads. We encourage the community to balance their contribution of low effort material with effort posts, links to real news/analysis, and meaningful engagement with material posted in the community.

  7. American politics: Discussion and effort posts on the (potential) material impacts of American electoral politics is welcome, but the never-ending circus of American Politics© Brought to You by Mountain Dew™ is not welcome. This refers to polling, pundit reactions, electoral horse races, rumors of who might run, etc.

  8. Electoralism: Please try to avoid struggle sessions about the value of voting/taking part in the electoral system in the West. c/electoralism is right over there.

  9. AI Slop: Don't post AI generated content. Posts about AI race/chip wars/data centers are fine.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS