536
WOMEN. (mander.xyz)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] yesman@lemmy.world 65 points 19 hours ago

The reason chess is a segregated sport is because the male players couldn't cope emotionally with co-ed.

Not only was their the sex-pest harassment stuff, but men who lost to women would become hysterical, hostile, and aggressive.

Women just needed clam, rational, and stoic people to play with, so they had to exclude men.

[-] Triumph@fedia.io 25 points 16 hours ago

I especially like playing chess with clam people.

[-] Zerush@lemmy.ml 4 points 16 hours ago

I like to play chess with people which are way better than I am in it

[-] vivalapivo@lemmy.today 5 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago)

I like to play chess and stare at boobs

[-] TheSlad@sh.itjust.works 4 points 12 hours ago

When my sister was on the chess team in highschool she would always wear a low-cut top with ample cleavage to the tournaments. She said it was very effective when her opponents spent more time staring at her chest than the board!

[-] Tudsamfa@lemmy.world 38 points 18 hours ago

May be a gross oversimplification, simply because, ignoring everything else around professional chess, the world championship is technically open for all genders...

But considering how FIDE makes women gain ELO by taking it from other women in mixed tournaments, its 2023 ruling on transgender players, and how former World Champion Garry Kasparov reacted to losing to a women, it might as well be the truth.

[-] Folstar@lemmus.org 26 points 15 hours ago

In Kasparov's eventual defense, he did say this after losing to Polgar:

“I was wrong about women playing chess. I gave an opinion a long time ago that I no longer believe.”

and later in his book wrote:

‘I won’t hide from the fact that I did make regrettably sexist remarks about women in chess around this time. In that 1989 Playboy interview I said men were better at chess because “women are weaker fighters” and that “probably the answer is in the genes”. The possibility of gender brain differences aside, I find it almost hard to believe I said this considering that my mother is the toughest fighter I know.’

[-] Truscape@lemmy.blahaj.zone 10 points 17 hours ago

Thank goodness online adaptations allow people to play without having to consider the identity of their opponent (because I don't mind who I play against).

[-] Frostbeard@lemmy.world 8 points 16 hours ago

The selection is already biased. High ELO ranked chessplayers are not all that stable to begin with.

[-] Anivia@feddit.org 9 points 19 hours ago

Yes, almost every sport where men are actually at an advantage allows women to compete in the "men's" leagues as well. Only when they actually start winning against the men do the rules start excluding them

[-] Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world 8 points 17 hours ago

What are the examples for the second sentence? Climbing?

[-] Warl0k3@lemmy.world 7 points 15 hours ago

Pretty much every shooting sport (excluding poundage-categorized archery because of draw weights), at very least.

[-] Siegfried@lemmy.world 2 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago)

~~Habing chess separated for gender is a huge red flag.. i feel like both women and men are ok with it for some reason cause otherwise i dont know how this is still a thing in 2026~~

I stand corrected

[-] chonglibloodsport@lemmy.world 12 points 15 hours ago

Chess is not segregated by gender. There are women’s tournaments and there are open tournaments. There are no men’s tournaments. Men are way overrepresented at all the open tournaments, but women do compete in all of them.

Women’s representation is increasing at the top levels but it’s a gradual process. Judit Polgar and Hou Yifan (侯逸凡) are so far the only women to reach the top 100 players in the world and regularly compete with success at the top open tournaments.

[-] terranoid@lemmy.cafe 6 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago)

The main world championship and title of GM is open to everyone, so it's not truly split.

There are FIDE women only tournaments but that's due to there being less participation of women. When you have something like this where the skill distribution is gaussian, if you have like 50 women compete and 1000 men, you will notice that it's extremely unlikely for a woman to ever reach 1st place just due to statistics. Replace women and men with brown hair and blond hair and you'd see the same phenomenon.

The tail of the statistics where you see extreme deviations of improved skill would be dominated by the population with much larger participation.

To counter this, they have women only tournaments so that you always have a woman in 1st place in some tournament, basically to improve participation and convince more girls to play when they're young.

There are of course probably other factors but these things improve participation and are meant to help get more women in chess, not separate them out.

this post was submitted on 13 Jun 2026
536 points (93.2% liked)

Science Memes

20452 readers
1850 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS