529
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] SW42@lemmy.world 20 points 13 hours ago

Just look how stupid the average person is. Half of the people are more stupid. Never underestimate the power of stupid people in large groups.

[-] panda_abyss@lemmy.ca 15 points 11 hours ago

The last few years have taught me that the difference between stupid and not stupid is oceans wider than I thought.

I turns out stupid people are closer to what I thought the intelligence of an animal was.

These people literally don’t think. They basically pattern match and that’s it. There’s no deeper reasoning. There’s no capacity for nuance, no understanding or extension of empathy. They can barely read. If you string the gibberish from an AI they’ll blindly trust that it’s correct above all evidence.

Meanwhile we’re seeing all these nuanced multi step problem solving behaviours from birds and all animals and even bumblebees…

[-] Ack@lemmy.ca 11 points 11 hours ago

I read something from someone on the internet who claimed to work with bear-proof garbage cans and apparently it’s harder than one might expect. There’s some overlap between the smartest bears and the dumbest people.

I’m sure the bears are more motivated, but still…

[-] acockworkorange@mander.xyz 9 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago)

I think you mean then median person. ☝️🤓

[-] TheRedSpade@lemmy.world 15 points 12 hours ago

Can't speak for anyone else, but I was taught that mean, median, and mode are three different types of average.

[-] acockworkorange@mander.xyz 8 points 12 hours ago

Oh crap. Translating average to my language yields the same word as mean. But you're right.

[-] jaybone@lemmy.zip 5 points 8 hours ago

Because mean means average. I wouldn’t consider the median or the mode to be an average. Not sure what that commenter means by different “types of average”.

[-] panda_abyss@lemmy.ca 7 points 11 hours ago

Under a normal distribution/bell curve mean and median are the same.

[-] acockworkorange@mander.xyz -1 points 11 hours ago

Considering intelligence/stupidity isn't defined, it's a lot to assume that its distribution can be approximated by a Gaussian.

[-] panda_abyss@lemmy.ca 2 points 6 hours ago

I don’t totally disagree, I’ve never seen an actual distribution of random iq scores

[-] acockworkorange@mander.xyz 1 points 6 hours ago

And there's plenty of criticism of IQ tests as a proxy for intelligence, even if we did have the data.

this post was submitted on 13 Jun 2026
529 points (98.0% liked)

Science Memes

20452 readers
1850 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS