Vaultwarden using Docker Compose with existing Certificates (lemmy.world)

submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by Lobotomie@lemmy.world to c/selfhosted@lemmy.world

17 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Hello Friends,

I have a small ubuntu Server and I finally also want to transfer my Vaultwarden Instance to it. On this Server I have several services running (homeassistant, ...) and Certbot via Dehydrated (right now I get a certificate for my duckdns address). In some directory I have the privkey and fullchain files.

Now my Problem is that when I start vaultwarden it wont load as https.

I believe, my Problem is telling Vaultwarden, where my certificate files are located so it can use them accordingly.

This is my Compose File right now:

  vaultwarden:
    container_name: vaultwarden
    image: vaultwarden/server:latest
    restart: unless-stopped
    volumes:
      - /home/vaultwarden:/data/
      - /home/(directory to my certificates):/usr/share/ca-certificates/
    ports:
      - 8129:80
    environment:
      - DOMAIN=https://hurrdurr.duckdns.org
      - LOGIN_RATELIMIT_MAX_BURST=10
      - LOGIN_RATELIMIT_SECONDS=60
      - ADMIN_RATELIMIT_MAX_BURST=10
      - ADMIN_RATELIMIT_SECONDS=60
      - ADMIN_TOKEN=token
      - SENDS_ALLOWED=true
      - EMERGENCY_ACCESS_ALLOWED=true
      - WEB_VAULT_ENABLED=true
      - SIGNUPS_ALLOWED=true

The Volume Mapping to the certificates was just me trying it out so maybe its working if I map it like that.

If I open the 8129 in my Browser it will just time out. I also managed it to start but it wouldnt let me register as theres not https certificate.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[-] Kangie@lemmy.srcfiles.zip 6 points 1 year ago

Here's the secret to stuff like this:

Run a single reverse proxy / edge router for all of your containerised services.

I recommend Traefik - https://gitlab.com/Matt.Jolly/traefik-grafana-prometheus-docker

You can configure services with labels attached to the container and (almost) never expose ports directly. It also lets you host an arbitrary number of services listening on 80/443.

An example config might look like this:

# docker-compose.yml
version: '3.9'

services:
  bitwarden:
    image: vaultwarden/server:latest
    restart: always
    volumes:
      - /data/vaultwarden/:/data
    environment:
#      - ADMIN_TOKEN=
      - WEBSOCKET_ENABLED=true
    networks:
      - proxy
    labels:
      - traefik.enable=true
      - traefik.http.routers.bitwarden-ui-https.tls.certresolver=letsencrypt
      - traefik.http.middlewares.redirect-https.redirectScheme.scheme=https
      - traefik.http.middlewares.redirect-https.redirectScheme.permanent=true
      - traefik.http.routers.bitwarden-ui-https.rule=Host(`my.domain.com`)
      - traefik.http.routers.bitwarden-ui-https.entrypoints=websecure
      - traefik.http.routers.bitwarden-ui-https.tls=true
      - traefik.http.routers.bitwarden-ui-https.service=bitwarden-ui
      - traefik.http.routers.bitwarden-ui-http.rule=Host(`my.domain.com`)
      - traefik.http.routers.bitwarden-ui-http.entrypoints=web
      - traefik.http.routers.bitwarden-ui-http.middlewares=redirect-https
      - traefik.http.routers.bitwarden-ui-http.service=bitwarden-ui
      - traefik.http.services.bitwarden-ui.loadbalancer.server.port=80
      - traefik.http.routers.bitwarden-websocket-https.rule=Host(`my.domain.com) &amp;&amp; Path(`/notifications/hub`)
      - traefik.http.routers.bitwarden-websocket-https.entrypoints=websecure
      - traefik.http.routers.bitwarden-websocket-https.tls=true
      - traefik.http.routers.bitwarden-websocket-https.service=bitwarden-websocket
      - traefik.http.routers.bitwarden-websocket-http.rule=Host(`my.domain.com`) &amp;&amp; Path(`/notifications/hub`)
      - traefik.http.routers.bitwarden-websocket-http.entrypoints=web
      - traefik.http.routers.bitwarden-websocket-http.middlewares=redirect-https
      - traefik.http.routers.bitwarden-websocket-http.service=bitwarden-websocket
      - traefik.http.services.bitwarden-websocket.loadbalancer.server.port=3012

[-] emhl@feddit.de 5 points 1 year ago

Using traefik as your first reverse proxy might be a bit daunting. Caddy or "nginx reverse proxy" are much easier to configure.

[-] 7Sea_Sailor@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 1 year ago

If you want it beginner friendly, I can recommend nginx proxy Manager, which is basically a web ui frontend for nginx. This has its own drawbacks, but makes setup very uncomplicated.

[-] koinu@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

I agree, very beginner friendly. But also, it's what most people are gonna need.

I actually started with Traefik because I didn't know any better, and I kinda wanna go back to be honest because with Traefik I was able to configure a Minecraft server, without having to expose the port. But not with NGINX Proxy Manager.l, since it only does http and shit. But I REALLY like being able to do everything via a webUI since I only have a phone to manage my server .

So, I find myself stuck between functionality and ease of use. :(

[-] Kangie@lemmy.srcfiles.zip 1 points 1 year ago

At the end of the day Traefik isn't that hard, especially if you know the core concepts; if you know both and have a need for Traefik I'd just use that everywhere.

[-] 7Sea_Sailor@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

You should look into NPM Streams, they're built exactly for this purpose. It's included by default, just another type of host.

[-] koinu@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

I've tried, but I wasn't able to get it working. I'll look into it again though, cuz I'd love to do it all through NPM.

[-] lemmyvore@feddit.nl 1 points 1 year ago

Nginx Proxy Manager can do stream hosts, which are encrypted tunnels where you can put any kind of traffic not just HTTP.

[-] koinu@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

I've tried, but I wasn't able to get it working. I'll look into it again though, cuz I'd love to do it all through NPM.

this post was submitted on 08 Sep 2023

24 points (87.5% liked)

Selfhosted

39677 readers

814 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

Be civil: we're here to support and learn from one another. Insults won't be tolerated. Flame wars are frowned upon.
No spam posting.
Posts have to be centered around self-hosting. There are other communities for discussing hardware or home computing. If it's not obvious why your post topic revolves around selfhosting, please include details to make it clear.
Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or github here. Just post the link for folks to click.
Submission headline should match the article title (don’t cherry-pick information from the title to fit your agenda).
No trolling.

Resources:

selfh.st Newsletter and index of selfhosted software and apps
awesome-selfhosted software
awesome-sysadmin resources
Self-Hosted Podcast from Jupiter Broadcasting

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

HybridSarcasm@lemmy.world

HybridSarcasm@lemmy.hybridsarcasm.xyz