210
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by berrytopylus@hexbear.net to c/news@hexbear.net

Nobody could have predicted this. I have my doubts even when they call it "spying equipment" or whatever considering Chinese claim it was a meteorological balloon, certainly no doubt they would try to paint those tools as such.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] queermunist@lemmy.ml 93 points 1 year ago

Reminder that the missile they used to shoot this balloon down cost $400k

[-] Weedian@hexbear.net 61 points 1 year ago
[-] KarlBarqs@hexbear.net 47 points 1 year ago

And in the immense wave of paranoia afterwards they shot down three American weather balloons at the cost of 400k per missile plus fuel and maintenance and man hours.

[-] egg1918@hexbear.net 18 points 1 year ago

And one of them was a child's science project data-laughing

[-] Chump@hexbear.net 3 points 1 year ago

Not sure which balloon she’s referring to, but I imagine it’s the one from the Illinois bottle cap and balloon club (or whatever it’s actually called, they took the name lovingly from the movie Up). No one ever explicitly confirmed that’s the balloon that got got… but literally every piece of evidence points to one of them being theirs. Hobbyist balloon club, so at least no weather data was destroyed!

[-] zephyreks@hexbear.net 5 points 1 year ago

Doesn't an F-35 cost something stupid like 40k an hour to operate?

[-] cynetri@midwest.social 40 points 1 year ago

greatest military in the world no doubt

[-] dRLY@hexbear.net 26 points 1 year ago

They love to talk all that shit about "our missiles are so accurate that we can hit a ladybug" or some such level of nonsense. Which all of a sudden goes away every time that it is shown how many more people were killed while trying to get one person.

[-] GarbageShoot@hexbear.net 21 points 1 year ago

Turns out they can only hit a ladybug because the heat from the blast fries the bug even if the missile misses by a wide margin

[-] forcequit@hexbear.net 14 points 1 year ago

superior firepower just means more firepower

[-] Tomboys_are_Cute@hexbear.net 34 points 1 year ago

Is that before or after the flight time on the plane they launched it from?

[-] queermunist@lemmy.ml 47 points 1 year ago

That's just the direct cost of the missile itself. The cost of flying the $200m jet I'm unsure of!

[-] GaveUp@hexbear.net 28 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

It's 70k per hour lmao. Amortized though so just 1 hour probably costs at least 100k

[-] quarrk@hexbear.net 19 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

The DoD is the world's largest employer with 2.9 million employees as of June 2022. Besides its direct function of projecting US power, it is also functionally a jobs program. The US is ideologically prohibited from handing out money for free via welfare programs, they must maintain the ideology of capitalism, by creating pointless work by which these people can "earn" the money. It is of zero consequence that each missile costs so many dollars. The whole point of its manufacture was to pay the workers and to allow the military-industrial capitalists to skim excess off the top of this waste. It's a sham but it is a little more complicated than just lighting $400k on fire. That money was already spent, and they want these missiles used in order to justify their replacement. As an additional benefit, each of these 2.9 million employees is heavily propagandized by the state department every day at work.

Long-term, it benefits the US if the industry and its warfighters are permanently ready to fight a war.

I don't agree with any of it btw, just adding some context.

this post was submitted on 17 Sep 2023
210 points (100.0% liked)

news

23569 readers
685 users here now

Welcome to c/news! Please read the Hexbear Code of Conduct and remember... we're all comrades here.

Rules:

-- PLEASE KEEP POST TITLES INFORMATIVE --

-- Overly editorialized titles, particularly if they link to opinion pieces, may get your post removed. --

-- All posts must include a link to their source. Screenshots are fine IF you include the link in the post body. --

-- If you are citing a twitter post as news please include not just the twitter.com in your links but also nitter.net (or another Nitter instance). There is also a Firefox extension that can redirect Twitter links to a Nitter instance: https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/libredirect/ or archive them as you would any other reactionary source using e.g. https://archive.today . Twitter screenshots still need to be sourced or they will be removed --

-- Mass tagging comm moderators across multiple posts like a broken markov chain bot will result in a comm ban--

-- Repeated consecutive posting of reactionary sources, fake news, misleading / outdated news, false alarms over ghoul deaths, and/or shitposts will result in a comm ban.--

-- Neglecting to use content warnings or NSFW when dealing with disturbing content will be removed until in compliance. Users who are consecutively reported due to failing to use content warnings or NSFW tags when commenting on or posting disturbing content will result in the user being banned. --

-- Using April 1st as an excuse to post fake headlines, like the resurrection of Kissinger while he is still fortunately dead, will result in the poster being thrown in the gamer gulag and be sentenced to play and beat trashy mobile games like 'Raid: Shadow Legends' in order to be rehabilitated back into general society. --

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS