726
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] chemical_cutthroat@lemmy.world 34 points 1 year ago

Hosting implies complacency. They have to draw a line somewhere, and the longer they wait, the harder it becomes. This was obviously a bigoted mod, and even though it could be considered "harmless" to leave up, it leaves the door open for further mods. These bigots will not stop slowly eroding away features they think are "woke", and they will only get worse and more egregious. Stopping them now, letting them know it's not acceptable behavior, is the only way to end it.

[-] kazakhspy@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

We can play the slippery slope game both ways. You say: if you dont remove a harmless mod, then bigots will start adding harmful mods.

I say: if we let moderators remove harmless mods because of their political ideology, they will start removing more and more mods that are not made by bigots, but disagree with moderators politics. Like for example, if player wants to play as a billionaire and exploit poor workers.

How about instead of playing the slippery slope, we just deal with actual harmful mod as they come. I mean, ffs, there is a mod that lets you kill children in Skyrim. Is removing pronoun selector really worse than that?

[-] mindbleach@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago

I mean, ffs, there is a mod that lets you kill children in Skyrim. Is removing pronoun selector really worse than that?

Yes.

The people this bigotry hurts are not in the game. They're real. And they're the only possible target of removing a checkbox that most people won't even notice.

[-] mindbleach@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago

We can play the slippery slope game both ways.

And be wrong.

One way is how trolls always escalate, because their entire fucking deal is pissing people off for attention.

The other is a textbook fallacy that plainly has not happened, since the last time Nexus removed some right-wing bigotry signal. This is not the first time. This won't be the last time. The line will stay about where it is, because they don't want to deal with this woe-is-us horseshit unless they have to.

[-] chemical_cutthroat@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago

You see, there's the problem. You have politicized gender and sexual identity. Don't bring your politics into the natural world.

[-] librechad@lemm.ee -2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Hey bud, don't tell me how I should play the game I spent my hard earned money on. If I want to remove a certain feature I don't like, you and I both should have the freedom to do so.

[-] AreaSIX@lemm.ee 4 points 1 year ago

You're still free to remove what you don't like, but you're not entitled to have the mod hosted on any site you want. The site owners decide that, and they don't want it on their site. That's not infringing on your freedom, but forcing it to be hosted on their site would indeed infringe on the site owner's freedom.

[-] samson@aussie.zone 1 points 1 year ago

You have the freedom to do so. Start your own hosting site or learn to code. Nexus doesn't have to host shit they want to. Stop being a bitch and forcing those to do what you want.

[-] librechad@lemm.ee -3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

What I was trying to convey is that gamers should have the freedom to customize their gaming experience based on their preferences. It's not about forcing anyone to do anything, but rather having the option to make changes if we want to. It's all about personal choice and freedom in how we enjoy our games.

Removing a harmless mod is a slippery slope because then moderators are just removing mods based on their political ideolagy. Kinda ridiculous if you ask me.

[-] samson@aussie.zone 1 points 1 year ago

There's no slippery slope. It's a hosting site and they can host what they want. If you don't like that go mod and upload to your heart's content on another site. You have that personal choice and freedom. They have choice and freedom to tell you to fuck off just like I do. Fuck off.

[-] chemical_cutthroat@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

I love that you are so dense that you are arguing for the freedom of choice, while trying to take away other's freedom of choice. Fucking hell, bud.

[-] librechad@lemm.ee -1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

When a mod is removed entirely, the choice is taken away from everyone, limiting the overall freedom for customization. The aim should be to find a balanced approach that respects both individual freedom and community guidelines.

I acknowledge they have a freedom not to host the mod. But, coming from someone who's used Nexus Mods for the past 6-7 years, it's sad to see them start to take this route. We can have a mod to kill children but god forbid we have a remove pronouns mod.

I'm stating my own opinion on the situation, I'm not forcing them to reupload the mod. I'm just trying to debate with you guys. Would you like to debate or no?

[-] chemical_cutthroat@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

No, I would not like to debate. Debating would be futile. I've looked through your comment history, and I don't believe that it would be worth my time. You want to bitch and complain cause the woke police are coming after your vidyas, then go for it, but you are on the wrong side of the argument, and you won't find many good-hearted people over there. Life is hard enough as it is. I implore you to rethink your positions on pronouns, gender identity, and sexual identity. Those that appreciate choices like these in the game are the people that are having some of the hardest times in their lives. They don't need you to come in and tell them that you feel like their decisions aren't valid, especially when it has zero actual affect on your life. Don't want to set a pronoun? Then fucking don't. That's your choice. But when you support mods and the bigots that create them that try to limit the abilities of those that need to have some comfort in their life, those that need to know that society is moving towards a broader acceptance of their identity, then you are the bad person, and that's how the world at large sees you. Be a better fucking person than that.

[-] librechad@lemm.ee 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I agree that platforms like Nexus Mods have a responsibility to consider the broader societal impact of the content they host. However, they also have a responsibility to preserve the freedoms that have made such platforms valuable to so many. The challenge lies in finding a balanced approach, which is never easy.

It's worth mentioning that I fully support your right to view and critique mods based on their societal impact. At the same time, it should be acceptable for others to evaluate these mods based on different criteria, such as user freedom, without being labeled as "bad persons."

Would it not be more constructive for us to have an open dialogue on how to balance these competing interests rather than dismissing each other's viewpoints outright?

[-] chemical_cutthroat@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago

Would it not be more constructive for us to have an open dialogue on how to balance these competing interests rather than dismissing each other’s viewpoints outright?

No, I don't want an open dialogue with bigots.

[-] librechad@lemm.ee -2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

OK fine, I don't want to argue with someone who's obviously closed minded and can't debate on simple issues.

Keep it classy bro.

[-] chemical_cutthroat@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Fine. We'll keep it simple and set the facts. I'll even let you define the problem. Tell me. What does this mod do?

Removing a harmless mod is a slippery slope because then moderators are just removing mods based on their political ideolagy. Kinda ridiculous if you ask me.

Removing a harmless feature is a slippery slope because then modders are just removing features based on their political ideology. Kinda ridiculous if you ask me.

It's just as ridiculous the other way around though.

[-] librechad@lemm.ee 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

You're point is valid about the two-way street that is ideological moderation, whether it's done by modders or platform moderators. While some argue that removing certain features serves to make a political statement, the same could be said for removing mods themselves. Both actions can be seen as influenced by the ideological beliefs of those making the decisions. In this case, the main question is: who gets to decide what crosses the line and what doesn't? And should these decisions be open to discussion within the community?

this post was submitted on 16 Sep 2023
726 points (90.2% liked)

Games

16834 readers
1075 users here now

Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)

Posts.

  1. News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
  2. Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
  3. No humor/memes etc..
  4. No affiliate links
  5. No advertising.
  6. No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
  7. No self promotion.
  8. No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
  9. No politics.

Comments.

  1. No personal attacks.
  2. Obey instance rules.
  3. No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
  4. Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.

My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.

Other communities:

Beehaw.org gaming

Lemmy.ml gaming

lemmy.ca pcgaming

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS