708
submitted 2 years ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world

The same week his state outlawed racial discrimination based on hairstyles, a Black high school student in Texas was suspended because school officials said his locs violated the district’s dress code.

Darryl George, a junior at Barbers Hill High School in Mont Belvieu, received an in-school suspension after he was told his hair fell below his eyebrows and ear lobes. George, 17, wears his hair in thick twisted dreadlocks, tied on top of his head, said his mother, Darresha George.

George served the suspension last week. His mother said he plans to return to the Houston-area school Monday, wearing his dreadlocks in a ponytail, even if he is required to attend an alternative school as a result.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 188 points 2 years ago

Conservatives don't want schools that teach how to think. They want schools that teach kids to obey.

The rules don't really matter, if anything they want the rules to be as stupid and arbitrary as possible, that way they get adult workers willing to take "because I said so" as rationale for fucking anything.

Like how in boot camp they focus on the most inconsequential details. They don't care how exact you can make a bed, theyre just teaching you how to follow orders

[-] brygphilomena@lemmy.world 87 points 2 years ago

Greg Poole, who has been district superintendent since 2006, said the policy is legal and teaches students to conform as a sacrifice benefitting everyone.

“When you are asked to conform ... and give up something for the betterment of the whole, there is a psychological benefit,” Poole said. “We need more teaching (of) sacrifice.”

It's explicitly said by the superintendent.

[-] ericisshort@lemmy.world 65 points 2 years ago

Follow up question Mr Superintendent: in what way does prohibiting this particular hairstyle “benefit the whole?”

[-] brygphilomena@lemmy.world 56 points 2 years ago

There is another quote from him saying it's a rule that's been on the books for 30 years. As if that's a good enough reason to keep it rather than actually being a reason to reexamine it's worth in today's society.

[-] Sir_Kevin@lemmy.dbzer0.com 19 points 2 years ago

Anyone who uses the excuse that "this is how it's been done for x number of years so we're going to keep doing it that way" should be punched in the face repeatedly until their teeth turn to fuckin dust because they should be able to speak anymore.

[-] NOT_RICK@lemmy.world 19 points 2 years ago

He named his ego “the whole”

[-] meco03211@lemmy.world 11 points 2 years ago

And not understood by any conservatives that constantly whine about selfish bullshit.

[-] orphiebaby@lemm.ee 1 points 2 years ago

This sounds like a toxic Chinese mentality to me.

[-] Semi-Hemi-Demigod@kbin.social 53 points 2 years ago

My kid is always amazed that despite violating the dress code she never gets in trouble. I told her that the rules aren't there to be enforced equally, they're there to give them an excuse to harass students and because she's one of the "good kids" she gets away with it.

[-] gamermanh@lemmy.dbzer0.com 20 points 2 years ago

Meanwhile I saw kids of any color hauled out of my school for wearing ANY red

Literally every other rule was flaunted daily but if you wore red they'd drag your ass to the admin office to take your shoelaces for the day (saw that one) or wear one of the embarrassing and huge and overused day use shirts (happened to a friend), didn't matter who you were

Just a funny story about my weirdly strict in some ways high school

[-] shalafi@lemmy.world 7 points 2 years ago

Uh, Red because Bloods, or what?

[-] gamermanh@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 2 years ago

Literally

Despite the local gangs using B L U E and P U R P L E as flag colors ffs

[-] shalafi@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago

Thought it was a dumb question, but I couldn't get my head around it. So Crips are all good at this school?! And who the hell wears purple? I'm old and out of touch.

[-] gamermanh@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 2 years ago

Both colors were local gangs of almost nobodies. Technically the blue one fed to the Crips somehow but idk I didn't hang out with those guys much

Blue was one of the schools colors so they couldn't ban that, but RED SCARRRRYYYY

I think they've finally lifted that now almost 10 years later

[-] Angry_Maple@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Some crips in California wear them, IIRC. It could be regional, too.

Smaller gangs will sometimes use a colour that's unused in their area, even if it might already be known to represent something else in another place.

My school has so many problems with that that they banned any non-black shoelaces and also implemented an expensive uniform that was ugly.

[-] jjjalljs@ttrpg.network 5 points 2 years ago

"There are in-groups the law must protect but not bind, and outgroups the law must bind and not protect". This is the core of conservative thought.

[-] chaogomu@kbin.social 17 points 2 years ago

Trust me, as someone who was military, they care about how exact you are when making the bed. It's not just about following orders, it's how well you follow them and your attention to detail.

Oddly, my military experience also focused on how to break rules, and how to know which ones to break. That and the knowledge that there was a waiver for everything.

[-] AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world 9 points 2 years ago

I mean, have you seen how they design schools these days? I've seen jails that looked less secure, and more comfy. They're conditioning the kids knowing that 1/4 will end up in jail or on probation at some point in their lives. They don't see them as children, they see them as potential "criminals" to wring every dollar they can out of.

[-] Blooper@lemmy.world 8 points 2 years ago

Looks like the superintendent is all about following the rules to a T - that is unless it's his kid - in which case he'll gladly obstruct an investigation a likely DUI.

https://www.chron.com/neighborhood/pasadena-news/article/Son-s-crash-has-Barbers-Hill-ISD-chief-in-hot-1790103.php

this post was submitted on 18 Sep 2023
708 points (96.6% liked)

News

35714 readers
871 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS