264
submitted 1 year ago by El_Dorado@beehaw.org to c/privacy@lemmy.ml
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] slurp@programming.dev -4 points 1 year ago

This is openly misleading. This sucks, sure, but it doesn't ban e2ee as the title suggests.

[-] gamermanh@lemmy.dbzer0.com 27 points 1 year ago

and as a last resort develop technology to scan encrypted messages, it has said

Right there in the article, my guy.

If you can scan encrypted messages then you've no longer got e2ee

[-] slurp@programming.dev 0 points 1 year ago

The title here said E2EE is made impossible, I was simply saying that is untrue. Clarity matters. It says in the article they removed the bit about banning encryption or requiring back doors to it before it passed.

The rest sucks, as I acknowledged, and they want to make it easier to scan devices that would include messages that have been decrypted upon arrival. There's already spyware they does exactly that. However, that doesn't make it so that E2EE is impossible.

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
this post was submitted on 21 Sep 2023
264 points (96.5% liked)

Privacy

31995 readers
1365 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

Chat rooms

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS