204
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 26 Sep 2023
204 points (97.7% liked)
Technology
59197 readers
935 users here now
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related content.
- Be excellent to each another!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
Approved Bots
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
Can't really hire the same quality engineers as big tech I think.
I work in big tech.
IMO, any company could happily hire FAANG quality engineers if they wanted to. They just need to offer the same kind of perks that you'd get from the likes of Meta or Google: career growth, easy team transfer with visa sponsorship, and some solid RSU's.
In my experience, the engineers in big tech are no better. They're just the ones that got through the process, and stayed because of the benefits. I'm a tech lead in my team, and I'm a self-confessed fucking idiot. The Harvard and Oxbridge grads I work with are no better than the ones I worked with that went to the local college.
I genuinely believe that visa sponsorship and remote/flexible working arrangements would be enough to entice many FAANG engineers away from servitude, and towards whatever company offered.
You can outsource and they're also huuuuuuge. If you think Microsoft need a trillion dollar cap to cover cover security you're wrong. This is down to simple greed and penny pinching.
I'm pretty sure they were one of the original "Big Tech" companies before the markets got flooded with cheap consumer electronics from China.