135

Just adding more and more clauses until maybe arguably the US (only its clandestine services and a few dozen of its proxies) didn't brake the "rule" with no consequence since this is just a fiction to mask pure power projection.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] ratboy@hexbear.net 16 points 2 years ago

If that persons' username is a nod to The Clash's Joe Strummer, I think the real one would be rolling in his grave. I'm kinda confused though, at first it seems like the podcast person is agreeing with you? Or were they saying "that was against the rules therefore the US didn't do it"

[-] invalidusernamelol@hexbear.net 8 points 2 years ago

That poster was good. They clarified that the US doesn't need territory, it just needs financial dependants.

this post was submitted on 02 Oct 2023
135 points (100.0% liked)

chapotraphouse

13896 readers
717 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Slop posts go in c/slop. Don't post low-hanging fruit here.

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS