view the rest of the comments
news
Welcome to c/news! Please read the Hexbear Code of Conduct and remember... we're all comrades here.
Rules:
-- PLEASE KEEP POST TITLES INFORMATIVE --
-- Overly editorialized titles, particularly if they link to opinion pieces, may get your post removed. --
-- All posts must include a link to their source. Screenshots are fine IF you include the link in the post body. --
-- If you are citing a twitter post as news please include not just the twitter.com in your links but also nitter.net (or another Nitter instance). There is also a Firefox extension that can redirect Twitter links to a Nitter instance: https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/libredirect/ or archive them as you would any other reactionary source using e.g. https://archive.today . Twitter screenshots still need to be sourced or they will be removed --
-- Mass tagging comm moderators across multiple posts like a broken markov chain bot will result in a comm ban--
-- Repeated consecutive posting of reactionary sources, fake news, misleading / outdated news, false alarms over ghoul deaths, and/or shitposts will result in a comm ban.--
-- Neglecting to use content warnings or NSFW when dealing with disturbing content will be removed until in compliance. Users who are consecutively reported due to failing to use content warnings or NSFW tags when commenting on or posting disturbing content will result in the user being banned. --
-- Using April 1st as an excuse to post fake headlines, like the resurrection of Kissinger while he is still fortunately dead, will result in the poster being thrown in the gamer gulag and be sentenced to play and beat trashy mobile games like 'Raid: Shadow Legends' in order to be rehabilitated back into general society. --
I would say that arming, training, funding, and directly supporting Nazis is fascism
A crime of which the majority of social democrats are not guilty, something even acknowledged by Zinoviev as he outlined the theory. Not every social democrat is Noske, that's not the point, the contention is that once conflict comes the social democrat will either sit it out or join reaction.
That's still an ideological position. You can't separate action and thought like that. If you decide that it is better to support X than Y then you have made a judgement between X and Y.
Mussolini and Maurras both critiqued national socialist theory as corruptions of right wing social theory born of an ignorant mind, both chose to support Hitler over mainline conservatism.
The argument from Zinoviev and Stalin was that the desire for peaceful transition was stronger in Social Democrats than their desire for transition, and so when the chips are down they would either stay out of the conflict or join the fascists. As such social democrats should be treated as moderate fascists. As fascist aligned. Not because their policies were the same (Although some post facto justification has since been made about how social democratic reforms forestall revolution) but because when conflict would come they would not be on the communist side. (Although even Zinoviev makes a big damn separator between the average social democrat and Noske, something the current adherents of social fascism don't, because nobody reads)
This theory was abandoned, repudiated and looked upon with scorn by the comintern after the end of the third period, in favor of the popular front.
Sure. Which is reason #94856 why its funny to see people who support this theory get bent out of shape when you call Russia fascist.
But also, calling right wing forces against the revolution isn't special. Its not special to say that Ford isn't gonna be on the barricades. But it is noteworthy that people who ostensibly support the socialist project will find themselves aligned with arch reaction because they are more committed to preventing revolutionary violence than they are to socialist ideals to the extent that they would rather accept reactionary violence.
I think there is a minor matter of wording that causes a lot of the argument here. Fascism is one wing and SocDems are the other. SocDems are not fascists, they are part of the larger body of capitalism that fascists are also part of and therefore will side with fascists when the body is threatened.
yeah, stalin was kinda just riffing.