59
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 04 Oct 2023
59 points (100.0% liked)
news
24524 readers
411 users here now
Welcome to c/news! We aim to foster a book-club type environment for discussion and critical analysis of the news. Our policy objectives are:
-
To learn about and discuss meaningful news, analysis and perspectives from around the world, with a focus on news outside the Anglosphere and beyond what is normally seen in corporate media (e.g. anti-imperialist, anti-Zionist, Marxist, Indigenous, LGBTQ, people of colour).
-
To encourage community members to contribute commentary and for others to thoughtfully engage with this material.
-
To support healthy and good faith discussion as comrades, sharpening our analytical skills and helping one another better understand geopolitics.
We ask community members to appreciate the uncertainty inherent in critical analysis of current events, the need to constantly learn, and take part in the community with humility. None of us are the One True Leftist, not even you, the reader.
Newcomm and Newsmega Rules:
The Hexbear Code of Conduct and Terms of Service apply here.
-
Link titles: Please use informative link titles. Overly editorialized titles, particularly if they link to opinion pieces, may get your post removed.
-
Content warnings: Posts on the newscomm and top-level replies on the newsmega should use content warnings appropriately. Please be thoughtful about wording and triggers when describing awful things in post titles.
-
Fake news: No fake news posts ever, including April 1st. Deliberate fake news posting is a bannable offense. If you mistakenly post fake news the mod team may ask you to delete/modify the post or we may delete it ourselves.
-
Link sources: All posts must include a link to their source. Screenshots are fine IF you include the link in the post body. If you are citing a Twitter post as news, please include the Xcancel.com (or another Nitter instance) or at least strip out identifier information from the twitter link. There is also a Firefox extension that can redirect Twitter links to a Nitter instance, such as Libredirect or archive them as you would any other reactionary source.
-
Archive sites: We highly encourage use of non-paywalled archive sites (i.e. archive.is, web.archive.org, ghostarchive.org) so that links are widely accessible to the community and so that reactionary sources don’t derive data/ad revenue from Hexbear users. If you see a link without an archive link, please archive it yourself and add it to the thread, ask the OP to fix it, or report to mods. Including text of articles in threads is welcome.
-
Low effort material: Avoid memes/jokes/shitposts in newscomm posts and top-level replies to the newsmega. This kind of content is OK in post replies and in newsmega sub-threads. We encourage the community to balance their contribution of low effort material with effort posts, links to real news/analysis, and meaningful engagement with material posted in the community.
-
American politics: Discussion and effort posts on the (potential) material impacts of American electoral politics is welcome, but the never-ending circus of American Politics© Brought to You by Mountain Dew™ is not welcome. This refers to polling, pundit reactions, electoral horse races, rumors of who might run, etc.
-
Electoralism: Please try to avoid struggle sessions about the value of voting/taking part in the electoral system in the West. c/electoralism is right over there.
-
AI Slop: Don't post AI generated content. Posts about AI race/chip wars/data centers are fine.
founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
The argument from Zinoviev and Stalin was that the desire for peaceful transition was stronger in Social Democrats than their desire for transition, and so when the chips are down they would either stay out of the conflict or join the fascists. As such social democrats should be treated as moderate fascists. As fascist aligned. Not because their policies were the same (Although some post facto justification has since been made about how social democratic reforms forestall revolution) but because when conflict would come they would not be on the communist side. (Although even Zinoviev makes a big damn separator between the average social democrat and Noske, something the current adherents of social fascism don't, because nobody reads)
This theory was abandoned, repudiated and looked upon with scorn by the comintern after the end of the third period, in favor of the popular front.
Sure. Which is reason #94856 why its funny to see people who support this theory get bent out of shape when you call Russia fascist.
But also, calling right wing forces against the revolution isn't special. Its not special to say that Ford isn't gonna be on the barricades. But it is noteworthy that people who ostensibly support the socialist project will find themselves aligned with arch reaction because they are more committed to preventing revolutionary violence than they are to socialist ideals to the extent that they would rather accept reactionary violence.
I think there is a minor matter of wording that causes a lot of the argument here. Fascism is one wing and SocDems are the other. SocDems are not fascists, they are part of the larger body of capitalism that fascists are also part of and therefore will side with fascists when the body is threatened.
yeah, stalin was kinda just riffing.