199
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Decoy321@lemmy.world 21 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Or we could use this opportunity. We can influence them into not only picking the lesser of evils, but leveraging the position to actually help the people of this country.

Let's get them to actually work with us and do some damn governing for once.

[-] TallonMetroid@lemmy.world 51 points 11 months ago

That requires that all parties act in good faith, which the GOP has not done for decades.

[-] nilloc@discuss.tchncs.de 10 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Yeah, this is picking between which cancer you want to die from, not lesser evils. All the candidates the GOP are gonna put forward are somehow gonna be worse than McCarthy. Which is fucking ridiculous.

Vote brain eating amoeba for speaker.

[-] ApexHunter@lemmy.ml 1 points 11 months ago

You should watch BrainDead. You'll never listen to You Might Think by The Cars the same ever again...

[-] Cryophilia@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago

Just a thought, but maybe something like this

GOP and Dems agree to a list of concessions

GOP nominates Jeffries (or just have a few GOP congressmen be conveniently absent).

Concessions get passed.

Jeffries steps down.

Democrats nominate previously agreed on GOP speaker.

Republicans don't hold up their end of the bargain, Jeffries just stays as speaker.

Dems don't hold up their end of the bargain, GOP still has the majority so they can hold up any legislation.

[-] baldingpudenda@lemmy.world 35 points 11 months ago

The problem is that Republicans literally run "on the government is useless". They don't want to govern. They want power. They want to finish turning the government into an extension of our corporate overlords and cut any and all benefits, except corporate handouts.

This is what they want, but it's a bad look since their voters might see exactly what they stand for. All they've done is hold meetings where they talk but nothing gets done. They're using their committees to run interference for trump and poison the well for Biden like they did for decades with Hillary. Then scream deep state is holding us back. Fuck 'em. They have the majority, figure it out.

[-] Uniquitous@lemmy.one 2 points 11 months ago

The thing is, there's no power in being part of a paralyzed government.

[-] baldingpudenda@lemmy.world 6 points 11 months ago

Meh, they shouldn't gerrymander the fuck out of districts allowing the craziest candidates to primary the ones that actually now compromise is part of governing.

[-] FooBarrington@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago

Of course there is, as long as you are the one paralyzing the government. Suddenly you have incredible amounts of leverage, especially if your voters are fine with you keeping everything paralyzed.

[-] Decoy321@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago

You're missing what I'm trying to say, though. If they want help (as this article is claiming), then we should leverage that.

[-] lettruthout@lemmy.world 25 points 11 months ago

I upvoted this comment but how would it be possible to hold the Republicans to an agreement? They already didn't respect the agreement with Biden.

[-] BolexForSoup@kbin.social 21 points 11 months ago

The problem is they will pretend they never did it anyway. The entire impetus for removing the last guy was he worked with Democrats lol

[-] TechyDad@lemmy.world 13 points 11 months ago

I'd want everything in writing before agreeing to anything. Even then, I'd fear that Republicans would go back on their word the second we passed this crisis.

[-] TheDoozer@lemmy.world 10 points 11 months ago

Are there any purple Republicans in the House? Are there any that aren't toe-ing the line and gargling MAGA Balls? Any that just want to do their job and being a moderate Speaker may look good to their moderate district?

[-] pm_me_your_quackers@lemmy.world 3 points 11 months ago
[-] kbotc@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago

Every single NY Republican on Long Island is liable to flip without working across the aisle. The democrats drew a map that did not fly and the judge put a long time republican in charge of redrawing the map which let people like Santos win. It’s been ordered back to the committee to redraw again, and New York will lose R seats unless they show that they’re pretty far in the centrist direction.

this post was submitted on 12 Oct 2023
199 points (97.6% liked)

politics

18894 readers
3211 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS