34
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] zephyrvs@lemmy.ml 9 points 1 year ago

Yeah, sure, there are no stockpiles hidden somewhere by secret services or criminal enterprises. 🤔

[-] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Thus the quotes.

This is still pretty big, though. I imagine further legislation will be easier if the negotiators can say that legally nobody has any chemical weapons right now.

Of course, I'm sure there's facilities that could start making them in a hurry.

[-] LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net 2 points 1 year ago

Also, the world at least claiming there aren’t any may increase the political costs of their use. Any country that wants to use them will face the backlash or being the “only one” to have them, even if it may not technically be the truth.

[-] masquenox@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 year ago

somewhere by secret services or criminal enterprises.

You say that as if they are two separate things.

[-] sockinacock@lemmy.fmhy.ml 2 points 1 year ago

Honestly I wouldn't be surprised if the big players have replaced chemical weapons with something just as horrible but more "smart" like micro-drones with explosive charges and facial recognition.

this post was submitted on 09 Jul 2023
34 points (90.5% liked)

World News

32291 readers
625 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS