464
submitted 1 year ago by Echo71Niner@lemm.ee to c/world@lemmy.world

The article accuses Israel of potentially committing war crimes in its conflict with Hamas, focusing on a siege on Gaza, airstrikes harming civilians, and evacuation orders. It criticizes the U.S. for not condemning Israel's actions and emphasizes the need for diplomatic solutions. The piece argues that Israel's approach could backfire politically and suggests that there's no military solution to the conflict. It calls for the U.S. to exercise influence to deter such actions, asserting it's in the interests of both the U.S. and Israel to prevent further civilian casualties and maintain regional stability.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] xdr@lemmynsfw.com 23 points 1 year ago

Funny how Ukraine is being supported for the reason of "fighting occupation" that is Russia and russia bad.

At the same time, Palestine is being given collective punishment because they are terrorists for fighting for their human rights and water and food and medicine and their own homeland.

[-] nexusband@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago

Well the issue is how they fight... It's a bit more complicated and not just black and white.

[-] greenmarty@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

I don't know (wo)man, somehow I can't image bunch of Ukrainians gliding into Moscow's music festival and youths facilities with aim of killing as many as possible as brutally as possible.
I would compare Hamas rather to Chechen back when Russia invaded them. And Russia killed their own people in at least two occasions when mass taken as hostages in that time.

[-] lolcatnip@reddthat.com 0 points 1 year ago

I don't recall Ukraine targeting civilians, even though it's clear they could cause horrific civilian casualties in Russia if they wanted to.

[-] floppade@lemm.ee 10 points 1 year ago

Israel has a lot of Palestinians prisoners who were civilians and many are children. In order to get prisoners, you need prisoners to exchange. Britney Griner wasn’t brought back from Russia using money or resources but another prisoner. Palestinians have no int’l negotiating power.

So we live in a world that has made rules that criminalize Palestinians right to defend themselves. Some take desperate action, after 50+ years of violence and apartheid, and you’re judging the reaction and not the the thing being reacted to?

I don’t understand logic like this. It leads to awful communities where violent people are propped up at the expense of their victims. No one responds well to apartheid and illegal annexation.

[-] greenmarty@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Why bruttally murder whole families though ? Take them meat shields and retreat ASAP it gives higher success rate anyway. Why parade naked women body through the streets ? Nah their goal is to kill all Izraelis, anyone foreing loooking or anyone not taking part their religion.
I'm talking about Hamas not the ordinary Palestinians just to be clear.

[-] lolcatnip@reddthat.com 4 points 1 year ago

Too bad Israel isn't attacking just Hamas, or even doing a respectable job of pretending to try. As far as I'm concerned there's little to no moral difference between Hamas and Israel's government.

[-] greenmarty@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

It's for international war court to judge and not some crazy butchers (Hamas) who punished wrong people anyway.
And if you are gonna imply it won't be just a) specifically killing kids as revenge is definitely not just, b) EU just doubbled their € budget that was already there to help Gaza . So not everyone is only supporting One side

[-] floppade@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I am going to respond as though you're being sincere, but it's hard to tell these days.

Some of the things you're referencing were debunked. Be careful about what you accept as fact, especially when the people spreading that "fact" have a history of making up similar things to justify war. The US made up similar things about Cubans, Afghanis, Iraqis, and so on to make it easier to justify a population for war or to desensitize the population to illegal actions like water boarding.

I want to be clear that my intention and internal tone as I write this is not judgement at all. I'm just trying to zoom out a bit and ask, "Why, when they've done it before, would they not do it now?"

Remember that Israel and Palestine are not the only "powers" who care about this issue or its outcome. And as such, Israel and Palestine are not going to be the only ones taking action -- just the ones people pay attention to while other state actors are obfuscated by the smokescreen. There is A LOT of propaganda on this issue in every direction. Every state is looking at the populations of its enemies and figuring out how it can exploit this event for its own security interests.

**With all that said, imagine being Palestinian: **

  • You've watched representatives advocate in front of the UN for decades. Your people still don't have the right to vote in it, but Israel does. So the state killing your people has to right to vote to ignore your pleas on the international level. The bully state has teamed up with all many other bully states. When I say bully, I mean they use diplomacy to back smaller countries into corners and act against their own interests. Voting against them may mean your people starve for the next 5 years due to IMF loans, aide programs, etc.

  • You conclude on the international level there is no salvation coming. No one with power is helping you and actively refuses to acknowledge your people are dying, let alone who's killing them.

  • Your grandfather died in the Nakbah (sp?), when the west forcibly eradicated 750,000 Palestinians from their homes to make room for Europeans -- Jewish or otherwise. Israel made it illegal to talk about what happened to your family. It's illegal to deny the Holocaust in many places, but it's illegal to recognize the Nakbah in Israel. Despite it being undeniable reality.

  • Then, the state that has been systematically killing your people -- the state whose own internal documents suggest they want it to be drawn out death to make it more socially acceptable and less obviously murderous -- is now run by someone who enthusiastically wants to swiftly kill your people off and is trying to reach levels of power that make that possible.

  • You see the Israeli people incapable of stopping him. The ones who care about the idea of your right to life that is. The other Israelis you can see sitting on hillsides watching illegal air strikes and cheering it on like Americans and fireworks. This was something people regularly engaged in before the Hamas attack.

  • This leader ramps up operations where the IDF forcibly evicts your neighbors and family members from their homes. The checkpoints increase, walking around your own town is logistically more similar to prisoner in a US prison at this point. When the IDF says your commute to work stops, it stops. It stops multiple times a day every day. You watch people be beaten during the stops. If they fight back, they're murdered in front of you.

  • The IDF soldiers are taking more people than they used to suddenly with their new leader. They're taking more children and civilians. They're intentionally bombing hospitals. You watch as leaders cry out to the international community, but for 50 years the international community has said your people are liars and deserve to die. Maybe not with its words, they haven't said that per se, but with the actions and lack of action.

  • You live in the most dangerous part of the occupied territories (afaik), Gaza. There is no way to escape. Israel has bombed all routes out before Hamas attacked. Israel's violence continues to escalate as the IDF protects settlers who engage in vigilante, racist violence, stealing your friends' homes.

Every second of every day is a question of when will the Israelis hurt me next?

Again, there is NO way out. Israel is taking more space and engaging in more and more violence as they do so.

So why would they? Because Israel intentionally, as part of their ethnic cleansing strategy, gave them no way out and continued to harass them.

There is no mammal on Earth that won't get violent at that point (except maybe manatees, lol).

[-] greenmarty@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Sorry for not replying to every single point given. Due to the shear amount of text I hope it's understandable.

My point is that dispute of the past gives no one special right to be extra cruel. Once someone starts killing babies, it no longer matter if they or their grandparents had very difficult life. They are baby killers from that point on. It's never justified to take revenge on innocent people. Regardless of what side it is.

We are no in 1949 anymore, EU is helping Gaza for instance by humanitarian aid which they doubled these days. UN push against Izrael's order for northen Gaza. So going to international institutions as humans rights court or war crime court of even just documenting any wrong doing is much more effective at making situation better than butchering bunch of youngsters.

[-] floppade@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

I only gave 2 points and you didn’t respond to either. I won’t give you the benefit of the doubt this time:

  1. You’re spreading a lie, and I’m betting it’s intentional at this point. The baby killing thing was debunked and even the President had to apologize for spreading that low. The IDF even didn’t confirm it.

  2. If you were cornered in the world’s largest concentration camp and things only get worse every day, what would you do?

The mental gymnastics being done to justify genocide. They have a MILLION CIVILIANS in a cage and are bombing the shit out of them. There are NO circumstances where that is an ethical or justifiable action. It’s not hard. You just don’t want to admit you’re Darth Vader and not Luke Skywalker in this.

[-] greenmarty@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Thx for making it shorter this time.

  1. I do not spread lies I gave an example that should make it clear that people don't get right to become criminals because they were wronged in the past. You can replace babies with kids/ grandmas/ women etc.... Point stays.

  2. I would probably try International humans right court, International war crimes court, ask for azyl in EU, Call UN for help, document and publicized wrongdoings, Emigrade,... Probably few more.... But i would not create terrorist cell, attack young people at peaceful music festival and murder families in their homes or kill daughter of one of the few Izreali who invest into Gaza and gives Palestinians work there.

Note: I'm against killing innocent people at any side of baricade but you seem to support the idea killing Jews . I wonder why.

bonus: I don't play to be Jedi since I left kindergarten, though I have to admit I miss it sometimes. Gotta rewatch original episodes sometime.

[-] floppade@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

I literally am a Jew. I support people defending themselves — even if their assailants are Jewish. You seem to think that Jews are allowed to commit genocide because they’re Jews. At this point, Israel has bombed 5 UN schools that had children sheltering inside. Being a Zionist and being Jewish are not the same thing, and not being able to understand the difference between them, is antisemitism. Killing people en masse has nothing to do with Judaism, and if you think they must be related, that speaks more about you than it does about my people.

[-] greenmarty@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I couldn't care less if people are Jewish, Arab, Budhists, Chinese or green mutants. I think that the problem of the west is deviding people into these categories.

Back to the topic. If you get attacked you get right to defend yourself. If you are oppressed and are too weak to defend your state, you ought to sought help.

But Hammas main goal is not peace or end of oppression they stated their goal is to kill all Jews. In meanwhile and if they succeed, do you think Palestinian get better life or they live under terrorist regime supressing their humans right?

As for Israel , they have to get rid off Hammas. IMHO they can't do that with shelling. They have to go in and clear Hammad with special force face to face. All civilian casaulties should be maximally avoided.

It's supper hard but other option is what? Live next to the ticking bomb that will periodacally massacre specifically weakest civilians because , terrorist will quickly learn no retaliation can happen?

[-] floppade@lemm.ee 1 points 11 months ago

Please stop spreading misinformation. You can read the Hamas charter online and it doesn’t actually say that their goal is to kill all of us. Furthermore, the ICJ ruled in — I believe — 2004 for that Israel does not have the right to defend itself against Palestinians as an occupying power.

Many people will have their arguments to justify enabling and funding genocide. Just own that you want to help kill innocent people while ignoring the truth that you’re doing that.

[-] NoneOfUrBusiness@kbin.social 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I mean Palestinians don't have an army and no means to create one. The Troubles would be a better comparison. Not perfect, but better.

[-] xdr@lemmynsfw.com 6 points 1 year ago

Neither does Russia use white phosphorus if I remember.

this post was submitted on 14 Oct 2023
464 points (86.5% liked)

World News

38971 readers
2267 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS