60
Two Hobbyists Made One of This Year’s Best Video Games (Chants of Sennaar) (www.bloomberg.com)
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by nanoUFO@sh.itjust.works to c/games@sh.itjust.works
14 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Here is the link to the game https://store.steampowered.com/app/1931770/Chants_of_Sennaar/

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] FooBarrington@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

It's because there's no review number in combination with varying certainty that makes for bad information regarding judgment calls about quality. If people are certain the game is a 7/10, that could produce a better score than being less certain about an 8/10, because the wider distribution (less certainty) could put more reviews below the positive/negative threshold.

But what do you mean with "more certain" and "less certain"? Again, Steam doesn't have reviews beyond boolean values.

The following reviews: 6/10, 6.5/10 , 7/10, 7.5/10, 8/10 will produce a 100% rating. More certain, less useful.

And since Steam doesn't have point-based reviews, the 100% rating is fully correct, as presumably each of these reviewers gave a positive review.

The following reviews: 4/10, 6/10, 8/10, 10/10, 10/10 will produce an 80% rating. Less certain, more useful.

How is it "less certain"?

It's only consistent if you assume all games follow the same distribution, which is not how reviews work in my opinion.

Do you have statistical analyses that show this assumption to be wrong?

[-] bogdugg@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago

My entire argument stems from the idea that you can ascertain quality from these ratings, which I am refuting. The rating is "correct" in that it is measuring something, and as long as people keep in mind what that something is, there is no problem. But this article, for example, uses the flood of positive reviews to make the case that it is one of the best of the year, which I believe is faulty reasoning.

What I meant by certain is that the reviews are more clumped together (again if you had a score - even though it isn't present presumably you could attach one to these reviews), so there's more agreement among different people about the quality of the product. If you don't agree that games can be more or less polarizing, you won't agree with this point unless I can back it up with data which I'm not going to spend time doing. You could go through Rotten Tomatoes and compare Critic Score with RT Score because they surface both those values and see how closely they track on different parts of the spectrum.

this post was submitted on 15 Oct 2023
60 points (90.5% liked)

Games

16812 readers
728 users here now

Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)

Posts.

  1. News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
  2. Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
  3. No humor/memes etc..
  4. No affiliate links
  5. No advertising.
  6. No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
  7. No self promotion.
  8. No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
  9. No politics.

Comments.

  1. No personal attacks.
  2. Obey instance rules.
  3. No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
  4. Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.

My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.

Other communities:

Beehaw.org gaming

Lemmy.ml gaming

lemmy.ca pcgaming

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
nanoUFO@sh.itjust.works