2
submitted 1 year ago by BrikoX@vlemmy.net to c/worldnews@lemmy.ml
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] vintageballs@feddit.de 1 points 1 year ago

I mean, yeah, he is a dictator. How is this news?

[-] AlgeriaWorblebot@beehaw.org 3 points 1 year ago

I understand it to be geopolitically significant. Biden, head of state for a big country. Xi, head of state for another big country. China's made it known they don't want Xi called a dictator. Biden's done it anyway.

It's the scale of the thing that matters here. It's a political statement of gravity. He's calling any bluff they've got going, and demonstrating that the USA doesn't respect China enough to use their preferred nomenclature. It's a calculated insult and a challenge.

[-] orbit@beehaw.org -1 points 1 year ago

A challenge yes, but hard to see as an insult by the audience as while the term isn't flattering in a modern context it's closer to how Xi has aligned himself.

[-] cyd@vlemmy.net -2 points 1 year ago

It's a calculated insult and a challenge.

Occam's Razor says that Biden, a famously gaffe-prone politician, simply made a gaffe.

[-] 133arc585@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

This is just a replay of the "Oh He's Just An Innocent Idiot" nonsense that was so popular around George Bush. People would say he's an idiot and that he didn't realize what he was doing, and that got him off the hook for the absolute atrocities he committed against not only the people of several countries around the world but also against the people of his own country. Don't give Biden the same treatment; don't let him off easy.

If it was a mistake, it's not a minor one; major "mistakes" like this warrant corrections after the fact, either from Biden directly or from White House communications. Since he hasn't corrected it, it's safe to assume it was intended.

[-] yogthos@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago

This statement was made at a private fund raising event, but the white house intentionally chose to publish it. This isn't a gaffle.

[-] gary_host_laptop@lemmy.ml -1 points 1 year ago

I mean, yeah, the US is a fascist regime which literally inspired Nazi Germany, the only difference is that Germany fell and the US remained to stay alive.

[-] Valmond@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

Nazi Germany was inspired by a lot of things, but absolutely the most came from Faschism, invented by Italian leader Benito Mussolini.

The USA couldn't have been fachist at that time even if they wanted to.

[-] gary_host_laptop@lemmy.ml -1 points 1 year ago

Nazi Germany literally just copied from the book what Usonians did to aborigenes, which if you don't know was a whole ethnic state thing, that without taking into account the treatment jews had in the US and black people. Mussolini didn't invent fascism, that was a thing that built over the years while he certainly gave it more form.

Here you have a video that goes mroe in depth. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R1gcipAvplY

[-] Valmond@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

Yeah let's move the goalposts... Lol

[-] gary_host_laptop@lemmy.ml -1 points 1 year ago
[-] Valmond@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 year ago

Mussolini established the first fascist regime.

You start to talk about ethnic cleansing, like that hasn't been done well before nazism or fascism were invented, as horrible as it is what even is your point?

The you bail out with saying watch this YouTube...

You come around as a troll, an astroturfer or someone very new to fascism and ww2 history.

[-] DefinitelyNotSully@sopuli.xyz -1 points 1 year ago

Just your average wumao. Downvote and report.

[-] Valmond@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 year ago

Thanks, I was getting owned responding I guess. Should have seen it with the agressive style and a username made of characters you can't write with a classic keyboard.

[-] boredtortoise@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Yeah both China and USA bad. What of it?

[-] Aesthesiaphilia@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

And why is THAT news?

Like are you people just learning this?

China is a dictatorship. USA is a corrupt pseudofascist empire. Russia is a criminal gang masquerading as a country.

And you're all...surprised? By this info?

[-] naneek@kbin.social 0 points 1 year ago

90% of your comments and posts are pro-CCP and anti-US. Do you get paid to do this? Or are you that brainwashed?

[-] monobot@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 year ago

I think that is not nice way to communicate with people.

They have their opinion and they shared it, it is not rare to be person in current era angry at US and The Global West.

For some people being pro-China or pro-Russia actually means being against US or against NATO, which can be understandable for some parts of the world that were under attack from them in last few decades.

Ask them what happened to them and why they think like they do, maybe we can learn something new.

[-] u_tamtam@programming.dev 0 points 1 year ago

Hey! I just started to notice your messages around, with comments very critical of the USA with no argumentation whatsoever, that makes you my very first Lemmy troll, congrats :)

[-] Valmond@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

Same here. So ; argue, downvote, report or "don't feed the troll"?

[-] Pixelphoria@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] naneek@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Looks like we have a Winnie the Pooh (and CCP) supporter

[-] orbit@beehaw.org 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

So Xi didn't make himself leader for life? And he doesn't exert significant control over China's government?

[-] gary_host_laptop@lemmy.ml -1 points 1 year ago

No... Xi was a member of the CPC in his village since young, elections are taken place at different levels, from towns to municipalities and so on, until you get to the National People's Congress where there members elect a president.

For the first level, the NPC elects the head of State and the heads of the judicial organs, i.e., the President of the State, the President of the Supreme People's Court, the Procurator-General of the Supreme People's Procuratorate and the Director of the National Supervisory Commission, and, upon nomination by the President, decide on the leaders of the central administrative organs, namely, the Premier of the State Council. (Article 62 of the Constitution)

For the second level, the people’s congresses of provinces shall elect the heads of the administrative and judicial organs at the provincial level, namely, the governors of the provinces or municipalities directly under the Central Government, presidents of high people’s courts, chief procurators of the procuratorates at the provincial level and directors of the supervision committees at the same level. (Articles 8 and 44 of Local Organization Law)

For the third level, the municipal people’s congress shall elect the leaders of the municipal organs, institutions, and judicial organs, namely the mayor, presidents of intermediate people’s courts, chief procurators of the municipal procuratorate, and directors of the supervisory committee at the same level.

For the fourth level, the people's congresses of districts and counties shall elect the responsible persons of administrative organs and judicial organs at the district/county level, namely, the heads of the district/county, presidents of primary people’s courts, chief procurators of procuratorates at the district/county level, and directors of supervisory committees at the same level.

For the fifth level, the people’s congress of townships and towns shall elect the heads of the administrative organs and institution at the same levels, namely, the heads of townships/towns. There are no judicial organs in towns and townships, only agencies dispatched by judicial organs at the district/county level.

Source.

He exerts as much power as any other president, or less, he can't do whatever he wants, there are democratic processes involved to take decisions...

[-] Valmond@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

Democracy isn't just elections. The URSS had elections and they were not democratic.

[-] orbit@beehaw.org 1 points 1 year ago

This was not a point on the mechanism of Democracy but rather Xi's removal of the term limit he worked within. As it stands, the people of China have no systemic method to remove him should they overwhelmingly disagree with his policies and unless he steps down he's in charge for life.

[-] gary_host_laptop@lemmy.ml -1 points 1 year ago

They weren't a liberal democracy, which is different, they very much were a socialist democracy.

[-] Valmond@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago

Okay so you really are a troll then lol.

A socialist democracy, what's next, a dictator-democracy?

Wait, that's your definition of China!

Looooool

[-] 133arc585@lemmy.ml -1 points 1 year ago

Just because you don't know what terms mean doesn't mean the person you're interacting with is a troll. Socialist, especially in this context, has a lot more to do with the economic order. That's why socialist democracy is not an oxymoron, nor is capitalist-autocracy for example. Dictator-democracy is not even similar, because you're abutting two governmental structure systems, not one governmental structure system with one economic system. Dictator-democracy and Capitalist-Communism both don't make sense as terms. Socialist democracy absolutely does.

If you want to argue the veracity of the claim that they were a socialist democracy or not, go for it. But as it is, you are the one trolling here, either purposefully or just inadvertently due to not understanding what you're responding to and thus assuming the person you're responding to is speaking nonsense.

[-] Valmond@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 year ago

Just because you don’t know what terms mean doesn’t mean the person you’re interacting with is a troll.

So you start your "rebuttal" with a slight insult, well well, you are right of course, if I do not know something doesn't mean you are a troll (or the person I responded to) but check out his posts and come back and say you see no trolling.

[-] 133arc585@lemmy.ml -1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

It wasn't an insult at all. Plenty of ways to phrase what I said as an insult, and I used none of them. I was pointing out that: (1) you didn't seem to know what terms meant, and thus (2) were using that as reason to assume the other person is a troll.

I'm not defending the other person either, I just get annoyed when I see people assume everyone is trolling simply because they're offering a contrasting opinion on something. If someone really is trolling, it shouldn't be hard to point to why you think that.

[-] Valmond@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago

He did say that the country of China, which is a dictatorship, is in fact a democracy.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[-] orbit@beehaw.org 0 points 1 year ago

I appreciate the source and will read it further. That being said, you didn't address the somewhat recent removal of the 1990s second term limit rule. Without a limit the communist party will be unable to elect another leader to that office until Xi steps down or dies. As most see it, this would make him more in line with a dictator than an elected leader.

https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-china-43361276

[-] Valmond@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

Just to add, it's not because a leader is elected that it is a democracy.

[-] orbit@beehaw.org 1 points 1 year ago

Democracy is broadly rule by the people. A leader for life without a mechanism for removal is one of many signs of a government that is not ruled by the people systemically. A benevolent dictator may rule in-line with the majority but should they not, the people have no ability to address it and make change at that level.

Further, no one has addressed the initial points made. Xi removed the ability for the people he rules over to hold him accountable. This is one of many indicators of an autocrat or one who is moving toward being an autocrat in full.

load more comments (14 replies)
this post was submitted on 21 Jun 2023
2 points (75.0% liked)

World News

32078 readers
846 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS