650
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] PeepinGoodArgs@reddthat.com 75 points 1 year ago

Maybe instead of a fine, it'll any amount of jail time instead.

[-] RojoSanIchiban@lemmy.world 76 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Violations of gag orders and contempt always feel infuriatingly "gradual" because usually people just STFU after the first one. Trump (as we all know) doesn't have the self control normal asshole defendants have. Give it another gag violation and this moron is gonna spend the night in jail, then we all get to see him without his daily hair routine. That shit scares him more than anything.

Once Chutkan's gag goes back into effect, he'll be in jail quickly unless Kise or Lauro actually manage to get through his thick skull with an air hammer.

E: Also getting the idea that Engoron is patient enough not to expand the gag order (yet, anyway) because he knows he's already effectively ended the Trump organization. Trump's business "empire" is basically a dead man walking already.

[-] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago

What about the direct grifting he's doing? Someone needs to find a way to seize those assets and end that supply of money.

[-] thenightisdark@lemmy.world 15 points 1 year ago

I feel bad for the victims but as PT Barnum said there's a sucker born every minute. Trump is tapped into a large number of suckers.

[-] Dagwood222@lemm.ee 27 points 1 year ago

A short stay in jail won't break Donnie. It will energize his followers, and we'll have to hear them comparing him to Mandela and MLK for the next century.

[-] treefrog@lemm.ee 21 points 1 year ago

I think the mugshots without his hair and makeup will go a long way in deflating not only his ego, but also the cult of personality built on his ego.

[-] grabyourmotherskeys@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago

All his followers look in the mirror every morning. He is their ego projected. They will feel rage vicariously as if they were the ones being robbed of their dignity and dig in further.

[-] whofearsthenight@lemm.ee 11 points 1 year ago

Sounds hilarious.

More seriously, these people are lost. There is little purpose in trying to convert them, anyone hanging onto Trump now is either so incredibly ignorant we should just try to stem their paint-chip eating habit, so stupid they shouldn't be allowed to order appetizers unsupervised, or basically just fantastically bad, as in "I don't care if the world burns as long as I make a tidy sum before we collectively have to close up shop."

[-] stewie3128@lemmy.ml 11 points 1 year ago

I've taken to publically shaming my maga family members into temporary Facebook silence. It's cathartic after a particularly frustrating work day.

They always bounce back to their old form after not-too-long, which just provides another opportunity to catharticallly wail on them.

[-] WoahWoah@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

"These people" are a fairly large percent of the country. Certainly enough to get him elected again. Wailing about them being lost, ignorant, and stupid doesn't change that fact. Ignore them at your own peril.

[-] whofearsthenight@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

It's not that they're a particularly large portion of the country, it's that they have outsized power thanks to the electoral college and it's easier to disenfranchise dem voters. I'm not wailing about them, so much as stating fact. If 4 years of the chaos of Trump, cozying up to dictators, the million+ dead from COVID that didn't need to happen, the complete tanking of the economy and causing rampant inflation, an attempted coup/insurrection, many of his own staff saying he's not fit, Fox News turning against him (privately, but those texts all got released, thanks Dominion), a rape conviction, a fraud conviction, him spilling military secrets on tape, him stealing and attempting to hide classified docs, and now the likelihood that he's going to likely be jailed or under house arrest while trying to campaign for president, if all of that isn't enough to convince someone to not vote for Trump, what will?

The point of the comment was essentially don't bother with these people, the only answer is to vote dem in '24, and get as many people as you can to do the same. Things are stacked towards Republicans by nature of the system, you can ignore trying to change these people's minds because idk anything will at this point, but you can't sit it out or not vote dem this time around.

[-] WoahWoah@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago

They're roughly half of all voters. You'll have to contend with that fact at some point.

[-] whofearsthenight@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

That's the problem, they're not roughly half of all voters, but as previously stated have outside power. As for contending with them, the only thing to do is vote dem and start changing policies. Republicans, especially with a majority control of basically anything, are a policy failure on multiple levels.

[-] WoahWoah@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Trump received 47% of the popular vote last election, i.e., roughly half. That has nothing to do with the electoral college, that means that roughly half of all voters voted for Trump to receive a second term, and there's polling to suggest he would receive more than that if the election was held today.

Regardless of your feelings about them, they're roughly 1 out of every 2 voters in this country. You can't just hand wave that fact away because you don't like them.

[-] PeepinGoodArgs@reddthat.com 18 points 1 year ago

Lol, they would, too! And then, like King's and Mandela's followers, they'd ~~peacefully march with signs saying 'Free my president, Li'l Donny!~~ probably start shooting people in vengeance because it's clearly the end of times and Joe Biden is the anti-Christ apparent.

[-] Taleya@aussie.zone 6 points 1 year ago

I thought obama was the antichrist apparent

And clinton

And the other clin - no wait she was pedo queen

[-] silverbax@lemmy.world 20 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I remember many years ago - while Clinton was still president - some idiot I knew said Hillary Clinton was the anti-christ and I started listing all of the people over the years they'd called the anti-christ at various times, then I asked them, 'doesn't the Bible say the anti-christ would be beloved by the masses?'

They replied with, 'well...maybe'.

I said, 'it does, and if you actually read that book you'd know that.'

These people are just children, not credible adults, walking around saying idiotic nonsense and we need to start calling them out until they shut the fuck up in shame.

[-] ChonkyOwlbear@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago

He already compared himself to Mandela.

[-] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago

I think some wag already said they'd be fine with the comparison - throw him in prison for 27 years.

Can we get the universe where he dies in prison?

[-] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

I'd be okay with calling him Mandela if he gets 27 years.

[-] squiblet@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

He’s going to live to 102 or something?

[-] ceiphas@feddit.de 7 points 1 year ago

as his followers go, he even might compare himself to good ol' Adolf and the maga crowd will cheer...

[-] pinkdrunkenelephants@lemmy.cafe 5 points 1 year ago

I hope that doesn't deter people from wanting him punished, because that fact alone shows why punishment is so important. It's about something greater than the provincial minds of petty little men who only care about themselves. It's about ensuring reality does not work in their favor. It's about creating the just world.

[-] Smirk@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

A just world like Pala from aldous Huxleys:The island? Good read, highly recommended if you share the same mindset as me. Which, although not quite as far along the journey as me, you seem to.

[-] Cruxifux@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

And don’t you guys have like… rich people jail in the states? Where he can play golf n shit?

[-] ripcord@kbin.social 4 points 1 year ago

Oh well. Still, do it.

this post was submitted on 28 Oct 2023
650 points (96.7% liked)

politics

19148 readers
2017 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS