205

emergency hitler particle transfusion (hexbear.net)

submitted 11 months ago by coeliacmccarthy@hexbear.net to c/chapotraphouse@hexbear.net

42 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[-] iridaniotter@hexbear.net 45 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Why do Germans get a unique name for their armed forces? Wehraboos? Actually better question, why didn't Germany get Article 9'd after the war? That's like one of the few good things the bastard MacArthur did.

[-] Tachanka@hexbear.net 48 points 11 months ago

why didn't Germany get Article 9'd after the war

us-foreign-policy

[-] Awoo@hexbear.net 41 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Why do Germans get a unique name for their armed forces? Wehraboos?

Normalising it functions to make the nazi armed forces just sound like regular Germany, which is part of re-nazification.

Actually better question, why didn't Germany get Article 9'd after the war? That's like one of the few good things the bastard MacArthur did.

Because they're white and the Japanese are not white.

[-] CarbonScored@hexbear.net 25 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Because Germans speak.. a different language? "Luftwaffe" is not a proper noun, it's German for "Air Forces."

[-] BelieveRevolt@hexbear.net 18 points 11 months ago

Personally, I would've just changed the name to something that wasn't used by the Nazis if I was in charge of West Germany after the war 🤔

[-] NuraShiny@hexbear.net 18 points 11 months ago

As a German, I don't see the point of this. Luftwaffe literally means air weapon. This is like saying there shouldn't be a US army because 'army' is the name the confederation used for it's forces. It's not like Germany has a Schutzstaffel any more.

I would much rather have had denazification, but of course neither happened so...yay?

[-] BelieveRevolt@hexbear.net 14 points 11 months ago

You could use a synonym like Luftstreitkräfte (or Luftstreitkraft, German Wikipedia seems to use both singular and plural and it's clear to me which one is correct) like the other comment suggests. To me, it just seems weird to still use the same terms as the Nazis, but it makes sense considering the whole ”no denazification” thing, I guess.

there shouldn't be a US army

I agree.

anakin-padme-2 You just mean the word army, right?

anakin-padme-3

[-] FALGSConaut@hexbear.net 6 points 11 months ago

I-was-saying there shouldn't be a US army

[-] Collatz_problem@hexbear.net 13 points 11 months ago

In GDR it was Luftstreitkräfte, for example.

[-] Mister_Bennet@hexbear.net 14 points 11 months ago

So in English it would the German Airforce. Not the German Luftwaffe.

Would be like calling it the French Armée de l'Air.

[-] CarbonScored@hexbear.net 3 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Yep, pretty much. No reason to refer to it as such.

[-] Utter_Karate@hexbear.net 4 points 11 months ago

Well, one of the quirks of the German language is that every noun is a proper noun in a way, since you should capitalize the first letter of every noun. I'm sure that plays a part in why people think it is an actual proper name instead of just a noun.

[-] emizeko@hexbear.net 25 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

had to look it up so I might as well share:

"Aspiring sincerely to an international peace based on order, the Japanese people forever renounce war as a sovereign right of the nation and the threat or use of force as means of settling international disputes. In order to accomplish the aim of the preceding paragraph, land, sea and air forces, as well as other war potential, will never be maintained. The right of belligerency of the state will not be recognized."

—Article 9, The Constitution of Japan (1947)