650
submitted 1 year ago by eee@lemm.ee to c/world@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] ammonium@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

That's one weird argument. Are you implying morality stops at borders?

And it's not even meddling, they are asking for help.

[-] drathvedro@lemm.ee -2 points 1 year ago

Are you implying morality stops at borders?

Kind of, yeah. A moral cause in one country can be an evil wrongdoing in other. Case in point - Al-Qaeda was formed because US troops were deployed in some country in the middle east to defend someone.

And it’s not even meddling, they are asking for help.

I'm okay with helping Ukraine. I'm not okay if it's helping only to fuck with Russia.

[-] ammonium@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

A moral cause in one country can be an evil wrongdoing in other. Case in point - Al-Qaeda was formed because US troops were deployed in some country in the middle east to defend someone.

Uhm, where did you get that from?

Anyway, I get your point, but your example only shows that morality doesn't really stop at borders for most people.

I’m okay with helping Ukraine. I’m not okay if it’s helping only to fuck with Russia.

If it's to stop an authoritarian state from taking over a democratic state it's good for me. If it's because of other less ulterior motives (and let's not kid ourselves, it's at least partly because of that), I don't mind. Is it bad when a doctor only saves lives because it pays well?

[-] drathvedro@lemm.ee 0 points 1 year ago

Uhm, where did you get that from?

Actually, I messed up. I thought al-Quaeda was created in response to US's invasion of Iraq, but it was actually formed a couple years earlier in response to Soviet-Afghan war. Still, the point stands as the guys got very offended by western forces presence on what they considered holy land

Is it bad when a doctor only saves lives because it pays well?

It would be very bad if the doctor is some kind of pervert who is only treating patients as a cover up for his obsession

Anyway, I get your point, but your example only shows that morality doesn’t really stop at borders for most people.

The point is, morality doesn't stop, but can be different across (abeit, blurry) cultural, religious, political or ideological lines. The US and allies cross a little more of those than Russia in this conflict, but that's a topic I'd rather not dive into. What I'm arguing here is against Putin's rhetoric which tells that "The only thing the collective west wants is to destroy Russia", so...

let's not kid ourselves, it’s at least partly because of that

I'd advise at least pretending that it's not and it's just being "the good guys". Fuckers like RT, Z-bots and other scum often take such comments and blow them into loudhailers to rally the support for the war. Trust me, "these guys just want to fuck you over" is quite a convincing argument. Besides, there's plenty of other reasons to support Ukraine

[-] crackajack@reddthat.com 1 points 1 year ago

Trust me, "these guys just want to fuck you over" is quite a convincing argument. Besides, there's plenty of other reasons to support Ukraine

Because Russians are highly nationalistic and have an exceptional sense of...exceptionalism. They have a siege mentality that any outsiders are out to get them (they have been invaded multiple times after all), and that a firm hand ruling them is the only one who could save them from external threats. This leads to the ruling class by easily manipulating the public to support them by stoking nationalism. This stoking of nationalism leads to them craving to carve their own sphere of influence, both avoiding and scapegoating the West.

There are couple of comprehensive and well detailed video explanation of the Russian mindset, which I think is a blindspot for Westerners in understanding their worldview.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f8ZqBLcIvw0

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sdFtqa54TuM

To summarise the videos in two words, basically say the Russians believe their country is "eternal" and "innocent". This idea stems all the way back from the 19th century with many prominent Russians holding the belief including Leo Tolstoy. This in turn influenced the post-Soviet Russian mindset that is fascistic. Many people cite Dugin as being Putin's influence, as a matter of fact, it was Ivan Ilyich. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ivan_Ilyin?wprov=sfla1

[-] drathvedro@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

Is that the Kraut I think it is? If so, I don't think I have enough salt to take with those.

Anyway, what's your point?

[-] crackajack@reddthat.com 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Kraut is a leftist YouTuber, not a politically incorrect username.

You could just, you know, read? Point being, the pro-Russian propaganda sounds "convincing" because the Russians are very nationalistic (and also many are too politically apathetic to protest) bunch to be dissuaded from supporting the war. Additionally, many ordinary Russians benefited from the war financially. Here's another video also putting the war into perspective for many: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ebS9h_QSrbI

[-] drathvedro@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

Kraut is a leftist YouTuber, not a politically incorrect username

I mean whether that's the "Kraut & Tea" guy. Just looked up - it is. You might want to google on that, too.

You could just, you know, read?

Did you? I'm saying "don't give food to propaganda" and you go on rambling about Russian mindset and how nationalistic they are. Even if true (not really), what does it have to do with the argument? The reason "they are out to get ya" is convincing has absolutely nothing to do with nationality or mindset. If someone comes to you with a recording of your neighbor planning on killing you, you will trust that person more than the neighbor, simple as that.

[-] crackajack@reddthat.com 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

You're on about why the pro-Russian camp sounds "convincing". It is not for others, it's for the Russians.

Except there is no recording of the neighbour wanting to kill me, you or the Russians. It is mere fabrication that the West wants to destroy Russia and paranoia on the latter's part. And what Russia has done is invading your neighbours' home out of paranoia believing it will secure you. The West had made many overtures and concessions to assure Russian insecurity. Putin accused the West of expanding NATO to include Ukraine. And yet, despite what happened, Ukraine was not promised that they will be allowed to join. The West knows Ukraine is the thin line for Russia and do not want to further escalate than it already has. Declassified British government files from 2000s revealed the Blair government is fully aware of this and they're reluctant to promote Ukraine's membership to the EU; believing the country is in the realm of Russia. The West was also friendly with Putin at the time which added to it.

Like the last video I linked, not understanding the Russian mindset is the blindspot for outsiders and we would do better to do otherwise. Russian imperialism is basically stemming feeling insecure. It's nationalism at the heart of it. Aside from that, nationalism is a tool to control the population. It is not a coincidence that Putin's main rival, Alexey Navalny, was convicted on the day after the Russian invasion of Ukraine while the public is distracted from the news of the conflict.

Russian's current behaviour and national exceptionalism is combination of all these.

[-] drathvedro@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

It is mere fabrication that the West wants to destroy Russia and paranoia on the latter’s part

Well the comments above say otherwise. The top comment was talking about "not letting authoritarian state gain more power and influence", with which I took issue with, and a few comments down the line that state that it's okay to fuck with Russia. By that same argument, Russia (and quite a few other countries) are completely justified in fucking with you, too. What I'm saying all along is to drop this argument, because the only thing it does is it enables this exact justification and fuels the war.

[-] crackajack@reddthat.com 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Russia is authoritarian and imperialistic, because they think history and the outside world have wronged them, and centuries of top down rule ingrained to them that an iron fisted rule will save them and bring glory. They don't need to justify their behaviour to others, they only need to justify it to themselves by fabricating fake outside threats that others are out to get them. Nothing about what I said is contradictory.

this post was submitted on 07 Nov 2023
650 points (98.5% liked)

World News

39153 readers
1473 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS