1851

submitted 1 year ago by fossilesque@mander.xyz to c/science_memes@mander.xyz

184 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[-] grue@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago

I suppose your only issue here is that the software vendor or some entity should support it forever.

If no entity wants to take on support, they should be forced to release the source code to the Public Domain. Copyright is a social contract, not an entitlement -- if you don't hold up your end of the bargain of keeping it available, you deserve to lose it.

[-] Kid_Thunder@kbin.social 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Well, I think a better solution would be to deliver all source code with the compiled software as well. I suppose that would extend to the operating system itself and the hope that there'd be enough motivation for skillful folks to maintain that OS and support for new hardware. Great, that would indeed solve the problem and is a potential outcome if digital rights are overhauled. This is something I fully support.

What is stopping them now from solving access to this data, even if it's in a proprietary format?

Really, again, I don't take issue with the abandonware argument but rather with the situation that I posted itself. Source code availability and the rights surrounding are only one part of the larger problem in the post.

Source code and the rights to it, aren't the root cause of the problem in the post that I was regarding. It could facilitate a solution, sure but given that there is at least ~20 years of data at risk currently, there was also ~20 years of potential labor hours to solve it. Yet, instead, they chose to 'solve' it in a terrible way. That is what I take issue with.

[-] OhNoMoreLemmy@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

This is really not a problem that's fixed by open source.

The microscope will be controlled by a card that only plugs into 30 year old desktops. If you open source the drivers for it this only gives you the source code to drivers for Windows 95. These drivers will be incredibly hacky and hard coded and probably die if you install a service pack.

Having access to the source code doesn't let you replace the entire stack because you're still physically tied to old hardware, that is worse than a raspberry pi and even just making sure that you can update Windows is a feat of engineering.

[-] grue@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

At the very least, being able to read the source code gives you a Hell of a head start on writing a new driver for an appropriate OS (and by that I mean Linux, obviously). Saves a whole reverse-engineering step.

Also, the "a card that only plugs into 30 year old desktops" thing isn't quite as insurmountable as you think.

I'm not saying creating an entire project to adapt the controller and software stack to modern systems would be cheap or easy, but it's possible -- and more to the point, seemingly less expensive than buying the new microscope for "hundreds of thousands of €" (especially in the long run, since the company is likely to pull the same shit over and over again), even if you've got to pay a gaggle of comp-e grad students to put it together for you.