172
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 53 points 1 year ago

He also voted to confirm Gorsuch and Kavanaugh, so you can thank him for the overturn of Roe as well.

[-] vladmech@lemmy.world 30 points 1 year ago

100% agreed. He’s one of those ‘least worst’ options at this point which is never a good feeling.

[-] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago

100% agreed. He’s one of those ‘least worst’ options at this point which is never a good feeling.

Party leadership seems to like having an abundance of "least worst" options.

[-] Lauchs@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

As would any Republican senator from WV... Which is what the next Senator will be (Dems lost every race in WV in 2020 by about 40 points.)

[-] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

Manchin is leaving because he knows he can't win. Moving to the right has failed as a strategy. There is no farther right for the party to go than Manchin. Trying to find an even bigger sellout than Manchin is a fool's errand.

A centrist definitely won't win. The rightmost Democrat in the Senate just admitted he's unelectable. May as well run a progressive. We just saw a progressive win a statewide race in vermilion Kentucky.

[-] assassin_aragorn@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Manchin is leaving because he knows he can’t win.

Either that, or he sold out to run third party with the enlightened centrists.

[-] Lauchs@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago

It's possible but I would be stunned.

Personally, I think this makes the Senate map much more difficult for Dems. While I hate Manchin, I like him more than almost any Republican.

[-] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago

It’s possible but I would be stunned.

Well, it's not like the party would ever let it happen anyway.

[-] assassin_aragorn@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

How'd the progressive win in Kentucky then?

That said, I agree with you that we should run a progressive. Someone like Manchin had an incredibly slim chance. A progressive has a larger chance of pulling off a win I think.

this post was submitted on 09 Nov 2023
172 points (94.8% liked)

politics

19097 readers
1727 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS