172
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Veraxus@kbin.social 66 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Is there any chance WV can elect a senator that isn’t a far-right fascist, regardless of the letter next to their name?

[-] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

Yep.

WV overwhelming supports progressive policies.

It's just the farthest left they could vote for in the general was Manchin.

[-] Lauchs@lemmy.world 48 points 1 year ago

??????

In WV, Trump beat Biden by damn near FORTY points.

In congressional races that year, the Democrats did even worse and lost by almost forty five points.

In the Senate election, the Democrat candidate lost by a similar margin (about 43 points.)

So I'm super curious how on Earth you expect the Democrats to win there...

[-] PugJesus@kbin.social 27 points 1 year ago

WV overwhelming supports progressive policies.

I live a stone's throw from WV.

They really do not.

[-] taigaman@kbin.social 12 points 1 year ago

They do? I'm in the area, and there are definitely some that support progressive policies, but the majority of the people I know from the area don't.

[-] FollyDolly@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

Depends on what part of the state your in. Some areas can be quite progressive and others full to the brim with Trump flags. Just depends.

[-] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

This 1000x this

[-] Rapidcreek@reddthat.com 31 points 1 year ago

This means that the West Virginia Senate seat will likely go to a Republican in 2024. And this announcement will raise questions about whether Manchin will run for president as an independent.

[-] Telorand@reddthat.com 24 points 1 year ago

I hope he does. He'll be about as popular as RFK Jr. and similarly get his ass handed to him.

[-] Iwasondigg@lemmy.one 15 points 1 year ago

I could be wrong, but I expect he'll do worse than RFK. Does anyone like Manchin?

[-] Wogi@lemmy.world 26 points 1 year ago

There's a dog I know, like all good bois this dog loves absolutely everybody. Doesn't matter who you are, this dog has nothing but unconditional love for you. I was sitting around, petting this wonderful dog when Joe Manchin came on the television. This dog stopped the belly rubs, sat up straight and looked me in the eye and said "maaaan that guy's a motherfucker."

Of course I was shocked, you can talk?? I asked.

This dog just tilted his head and asked for more belly rubs.

[-] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago
[-] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

I hope that no one who spent the past 4 years defending him starts pretending that they've always disliked him now.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] assassin_aragorn@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

He's like 76 too. If I have to vote for an old guy, it'll be one who actually has a chance of winning and isn't a conniving backstabber

[-] knotthatone@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

Corrupt pain in the ass that he was, this is not good news. 2024 was already an awful map for Democrats to hold the Senate, this makes it even harder.

[-] vladmech@lemmy.world 25 points 1 year ago

I don’t care for him or his politics but he overwhelmingly supported Biden’s judges and helped keep the Senate blue so I guess I’ll miss him haha.

[-] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 53 points 1 year ago

He also voted to confirm Gorsuch and Kavanaugh, so you can thank him for the overturn of Roe as well.

[-] vladmech@lemmy.world 30 points 1 year ago

100% agreed. He’s one of those ‘least worst’ options at this point which is never a good feeling.

[-] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago

100% agreed. He’s one of those ‘least worst’ options at this point which is never a good feeling.

Party leadership seems to like having an abundance of "least worst" options.

load more comments (6 replies)
[-] ptz@dubvee.org 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

As one of his constituents, that's pretty much my opinion too.

The likely candidate we'd end up electing (not with my vote, mind you) would be our current governor who...isn't great but could be worse.

My main fear is the MAGA stooge Morrissey (our current AG) who is likely to become governor.

[-] Zugyuk@lemmy.world 20 points 1 year ago

Stop, don't, come back...

[-] DirkMcCallahan@lemmy.world 18 points 1 year ago

Well, this sucks. Yes, he was an obstructionist asshole and many of his votes were real howlers, but without him, Biden wouldn't have had ANY majority in the Senate during his first two years.

Given how wretched the Senate map is for Dems, I'm extremely pessimistic about them holding the Senate in 2024. None of the GOP seats look flippable, and the Dems now have to hold every battleground state (Montana, Ohio, etc.).

[-] Rapidcreek@reddthat.com 10 points 1 year ago

Democrats have a 51-49 majority in the Senate.

They can still keep control. But with the loss of West Virginia, they have to win re-election for: Tester in Montana, Brown in Ohio, Casey in Pennsylvania, and keep Sinema's seat in Arizona and the retiring Stabenow's seat in Michigan.

It will be tough. But it's doable.

[-] cm0002@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago

Michigan is probably their easiest state, it's been going left for awhile now and is probably the most left leaning Midwest state of all lol

[-] just_another_person@lemmy.world 17 points 1 year ago

Good riddance.

[-] cabron_offsets@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago
[-] Sanity_in_Moderation@lemmy.world 20 points 1 year ago

His replacement will be a Republican. He kept the Senate from being a Republican majority.

[-] MJKee9@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago

No. He kept his pockets lined with cash from the coal industry.

[-] Lauchs@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago

People can do multiple things. Would you rather a Republican controlled Senate, with a Republican senator taking cash from the coal industry?

[-] NocturnalMorning@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

What's the difference? Joe Manchin still held up legislation, and threw tantrums when he didn't get his way. Not everybody votes Democrat just because there's a D next to the name. Hell, if we got rid of first past the post, I'd never vote for a Democrat again. Wouldn't vote Republican either, just to be clear.

[-] CaptainPedantic@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago

The difference is being able to confirm judicial appointments. We have Gorsuch on the SC because the Republicans had a majority in the Senate and wouldn't confirm Obama's appointment.

Manchin is a coal dust covered piece of shit, but he's the least shitty senator WV will probably ever send to the Senate. Don't let perfection be the enemy of ~~progress~~ not going backwards.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] MJKee9@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

If they vote for a republican then so be it. Better than a Republican in Dem's clothes. Besides, maybe when people have an option that is better than "shitty fake dem" versus fascist, maybe they'll surprise you.

So no Biden appointed judges? Mitch McConnell as majority leader? No committee chairs? You see no problem with any of that?

[-] MJKee9@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

You are assuming that a good democratic candidate wouldn't win. Maybe a good democratic candidate never ran because they didn't want to split the vote.

I invite you to Google West Virginia.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] joker125@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Yep however I won't miss this drama queen.

Somehow I actually look forward to seeing the pathetic replacement the GOP manages to cough up.

At least we know where we stand.

My real concern is a Trump/ Mansion ticket (yes the misspelling is intentional for marketing reasons)

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago

So, who's the next senator to perfectly represent every last centrist in the country by blocking things Democrats ran on but never had any intention of implementing?

Don't pretend that there isn't a line of them just itching to be the next Perfect Centrist.

[-] blazera@kbin.social 8 points 1 year ago
load more comments (3 replies)
[-] Alph4d0g@discuss.tchncs.de 7 points 1 year ago

I suspect he and Sinema are the tip of the iceberg. There's a few other corporate ball coddlers in there that were happy to have Manchin and Sinema the the heat that they otherwise might have to take.

[-] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

In addition to the two centrists you mentioned, six members of the Democratic caucus voted to keep the federal minimum wage at 7.25 an hour (2.13 an hour tipped). If we're talking candidates for the next rotating villain, I wouldn't bet against any of those.

[-] ptz@dubvee.org 2 points 1 year ago

Our coal baron governor is the likely replacement. I don't know who else has announced they're running yet, but all signs point to JJ getting elected into Manchin's seat.

[-] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

I didn't say that the person who replaces Manchin's function in the Senate would be from WV.

[-] joker125@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Oh look, somebody else is begging for a billionaire-shadow-funded spoiler campaign.

Sorry but RFK JR beat him to the punch.

[-] ImFresh3x@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Horrible senator. Best we’d ever get out of West Virginia though. This only lowers the oddds dems can retain majority leader going forward by quite a bit. And means the Supreme Court will likely become more conservative.

[-] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 21 points 1 year ago

And means the Supreme Court will likely become more conservative.

He voted to confirm Gorsuch and Kavanaugh. He is directly responsible for the Supreme Court becoming more conservative already.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 09 Nov 2023
172 points (94.8% liked)

politics

19096 readers
1719 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS