150
submitted 2 years ago by yogthos@lemmy.ml to c/worldnews@lemmy.ml
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Cockmaster6000@sh.itjust.works 0 points 2 years ago

Sure but what's the forest growth per capita?

[-] Vode_An@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 years ago

How is that relevant? Serious question, I don’t see a link between forests and per capita that actually matters. If we were talking about economic comparisons, sure. If anything, adjusting it as “per sq mile of forestable land” would make more sense.

[-] Cockmaster6000@sh.itjust.works -3 points 2 years ago

It's relevant because, as demonstrated multiple times in this thread, when the topic of pollution and emissions from China comes up everyone rushes to defend them with "but muh per capita". As if the environment cares.

[-] Vode_An@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 years ago

So you said something irrelevant as a jumping off point for an axe you wanted to grind? Good job

[-] Cockmaster6000@sh.itjust.works -2 points 2 years ago
[-] Vode_An@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 years ago

Link your Twitter. I bet you have a statue pfp

this post was submitted on 12 Nov 2023
150 points (77.2% liked)

World News

37062 readers
592 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS