150
submitted 1 year ago by yogthos@lemmy.ml to c/worldnews@lemmy.ml
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Cockmaster6000@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 year ago

Sure but what's the forest growth per capita?

[-] Vode_An@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago

How is that relevant? Serious question, I don’t see a link between forests and per capita that actually matters. If we were talking about economic comparisons, sure. If anything, adjusting it as “per sq mile of forestable land” would make more sense.

[-] Cockmaster6000@sh.itjust.works -3 points 1 year ago

It's relevant because, as demonstrated multiple times in this thread, when the topic of pollution and emissions from China comes up everyone rushes to defend them with "but muh per capita". As if the environment cares.

[-] Vode_An@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago

So you said something irrelevant as a jumping off point for an axe you wanted to grind? Good job

[-] Cockmaster6000@sh.itjust.works -2 points 1 year ago
[-] Vode_An@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

Link your Twitter. I bet you have a statue pfp

this post was submitted on 12 Nov 2023
150 points (77.2% liked)

World News

32327 readers
756 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS