157
submitted 10 months ago by nico@r.dcotta.eu to c/selfhosted@lemmy.world

A few months ago I went on a quest for a DNS server and was dissatisfied with current maintained projects. They were either good at adblocking (Blocky, grimd...) or good at specifying custom DNS (CoreDNS...).

So I forked grimd and embarked on rewriting a good chunk of it for it to address my needs - the result is leng.

  • it is fast
  • it is small
  • it is easy
  • you can specify blocklists and it will fetch them for you
  • you can specify custom DNS records with proper zone file syntax (SRV records, etc)
  • it supports DNS-over-HTTPS so you can stay private
  • it is well-documented
  • can be deployed on systemd, docker, or Nix

I have been running it as my nameserver in a Nomad cluster since! I plan to keep maintaining and improving it, so feel free to give it a try if it also fulfils your needs

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Strit@lemmy.linuxuserspace.show 12 points 10 months ago

This looks interesting.

So it's like PiHole, but written in Go, smaller and faster?

[-] nico@r.dcotta.eu 4 points 10 months ago

Yes (much simpler) and also allows you to specify custom DNS, which is very useful for more advanced self-hosted deployments - this is something PiHole is just not built to address

[-] ShunkW@lemmy.world 36 points 10 months ago

How is PiHole not built for custom DNS? It literally has an entire management page for that.

[-] chiisana@lemmy.chiisana.net 11 points 10 months ago

Last I used PiHole many years back, it was possible to use it as DHCP but not possible to add custom DNS records like TXT, SRV, etc. . Perhaps that’s what OP is trying to solve for?

[-] myogg@lemmy.world 26 points 10 months ago

Pinhole has allowed custom local records for a very long time now

[-] nico@r.dcotta.eu 2 points 10 months ago

Including SRV records? I found that some servers (blocky as well) only support very basic CNAME or A records, without being able to specify parameters like TTL, etc.

I also appreciate being able to define this in a file rather than a web UI

[-] AndyM@feddit.de 13 points 10 months ago

It's based on dnsmasq. You could always specify custom records, even before there was an option in the web interface. Just create a config file in /etc/dnsmasq.d

Just look up these options: host-record cname srv-host

[-] nico@r.dcotta.eu 5 points 10 months ago

Thanks! I didn't know you could do that. I'll see how it compares to my current solution

[-] Eideen@lemmy.world 5 points 10 months ago

I do it via dnsmasq, that Pi uses.

I have a ansible playbook, that i use to sync my Piholes.

[-] Stubborn9867@lemmy.jnks.xyz 2 points 10 months ago

You can do the basic records via file. /etc/pihole/custom.list is a hosts formatted file for records so you don't have to use a gui.

[-] Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 10 months ago

You can set CNAME and DNS. Not much else I need at home for a reverse proxy.

[-] nico@r.dcotta.eu 3 points 10 months ago

Like chiisana@lemmy.chiisana.net said - I want to be able to add my own records (SRV, A, CNAME...) so that I can point to the services hosted in my VPN. CoreDNS is good for this but it doesn't also do adblocking. If PiHole can do this, I don't know how.

I also don't need a web UI, DHCP server, and so on: I just want a config file and some prometheus metrics

[-] jherazob@kbin.social 2 points 10 months ago

Tangential partial offtopic aside: Unless i'm misunderstanding, you're setting this up behind your home router and allowing it on your various devices using a VPN. Am i right? Any details, or even better, guides, on how to replicate this setup? I guess the DNS records on Leng are to be able to call services inside your home LAN by name instead of IPs, which is a nice quality of life upgrade.

[-] nico@r.dcotta.eu 1 points 10 months ago

What you described is correct! How to replicate this will depend heavily on your setup.

In my specific scenario, I make the containers of all my apps use leng as my DNS server. If you use plain docker see here, if you use docker compose you can do:

version: 2
services:
 application:
  dns: [10.10.0.0] # address of leng server here!

Personally, I use Nomad, so I specify that in the job file of each service.

Then I use wireguard as my VPN and (in my personal devices) I set the DNS field to the address of the leng server. If you would like more details I can document this approach better in leng's docs :). But like I said, the best way to do this won't be the same if you don't use docker or wireguard.

If you are interested in Nomad and calling services by name instead of IP, you can see this tangentially related blog post of mine as well

this post was submitted on 15 Nov 2023
157 points (95.9% liked)

Selfhosted

39276 readers
241 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

  1. Be civil: we're here to support and learn from one another. Insults won't be tolerated. Flame wars are frowned upon.

  2. No spam posting.

  3. Posts have to be centered around self-hosting. There are other communities for discussing hardware or home computing. If it's not obvious why your post topic revolves around selfhosting, please include details to make it clear.

  4. Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or github here. Just post the link for folks to click.

  5. Submission headline should match the article title (don’t cherry-pick information from the title to fit your agenda).

  6. No trolling.

Resources:

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS