1260
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] JohnDoe@lemmy.myserv.one 3 points 1 year ago

Wish there was common nomenclature for referring to posters or parts of a comment to make the context clearer. Friends say I am on the spectrum but the Psychologist said that doesn't seem to be the case.

Like, OP1 is lame, OP2 supports genocide, etc. to clarify within a thread without having to quote or @ which I find a bit clumsy and generally gets in the way of flow.

[-] FaeDrifter@midwest.social 2 points 1 year ago

This sounds like a great idea!

I'll clarify, I'm just putting out a reminder that being fascist is not an inherent trait, like green eyes or dark skin. Literally anyone can fall into the trap of fascist thinking. The only way to be truly anti-fascist is to recognize the warning signs in your own thoughts and worldview.

So centrism can sometimes be a trap, but don't demonize the practice of seeing both sides. Taking a hard line with one sides is a step on the path to becoming a fascist.

[-] CosmicCleric@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

So centrism can sometimes be a trap, but don’t demonize the practice of seeing both sides.

Wise words.

It's how Peace is achieved.

Taking a hard line with one sides is a step on the path to becoming a fascist.

And War, and death.

[-] CosmicCleric@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Wish there was common nomenclature for referring to posters or parts of a comment to make the context clearer.

For comments, that's how I do it.

Throw one, too, or three asterisks around each side of the sentence you want to highlight.

No need for special verbage or nomenclature. It's done visually.

[-] Karyoplasma@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 1 year ago

There should be a distinction between the OP of the thread and the OP of the comment imo. It can get confusing.

[-] CosmicCleric@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

There should be a distinction between the OP of the thread and the OP of the comment imo.

OPT and OPC?

[-] Karyoplasma@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 1 year ago

Something like that, yeah. Is that a thing already or did you just come up with it?

[-] CosmicCleric@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Is that a thing already or did you just come up with it?

Unless I accidentally reinvented them, those came from me.

[-] JohnDoe@lemmy.myserv.one 1 points 1 year ago

Yeah I think what I dislike about that is it breaks up the flow of whatever I am writing. There's a coherence that is lost.

I'm accustomed to reading books or essays where there might be an excerpt, but more likely a paraphrase of what the author considers their opponent's argument to be. This makes it helpful at times to pinpoint a misunderstanding in the author.

But yeah, having consistent rules on the internet for posting is a losing battle I think. More or less thinking out loud, appreciate the comment.

[-] CosmicCleric@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Yeah I think what I dislike about that is it breaks up the flow of whatever I am writing.

No, It doesn't have to.

You can just write it out straight, without formatting, and then after you're done that go back and add the asterisks to emphasize the parts that you want to emphasize, already having your thoughts jotted down.

[-] JohnDoe@lemmy.myserv.one 1 points 1 year ago

Fair, this might be a stylistic thing. I'll def try and see how it goes.

this post was submitted on 17 Nov 2023
1260 points (87.9% liked)

A Boring Dystopia

9748 readers
255 users here now

Pictures, Videos, Articles showing just how boring it is to live in a dystopic society, or with signs of a dystopic society.

Rules (Subject to Change)

--Be a Decent Human Being

--Posting news articles: include the source name and exact title from article in your post title

--Posts must have something to do with the topic

--Zero tolerance for Racism/Sexism/Ableism/etc.

--No NSFW content

--Abide by the rules of lemmy.world

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS