669
submitted 10 months ago by jeffw@lemmy.world to c/politics@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Drinvictus@discuss.tchncs.de 146 points 10 months ago

This man could have been the president

[-] Thteven@lemmy.world 81 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Not if the DNC had anything to do about it, and they did.

[-] spider@lemmy.nz 10 points 10 months ago

After all, they're part of The Big Club.

(NSFW - language)

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 41 points 10 months ago

I voted for him, but I have a feeling his agenda would have gone nowhere thanks to the corporate ass-kissers in both parties in congress and the judiciary. Maybe we don't deserve social democracy.

[-] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 22 points 10 months ago

I voted for him, but I have a feeling his agenda would have gone nowhere thanks to the corporate ass-kissers in both parties in congress and the judiciary. Maybe we don’t deserve social democracy.

Not with that attitude we don't.

[-] 4lan@lemmy.world 12 points 10 months ago

that kind of defeatism guarantees that we will never have a morally upstanding president.

You are a part of a self-fulfilling prophecy. Sanders would not get everything he wants done in a term, but any progress is better than our current puppet presidents

[-] cabron_offsets@lemmy.world 20 points 10 months ago

Nah, tho. Young people didn’t vote in high enough numbers. Depressing. I voted Bernie.

[-] Esqplorer@lemmy.zip 29 points 10 months ago

I didn't. I was wrong. I'm sorry.

[-] KingJalopy@lemm.ee 31 points 10 months ago

At least you own it. That's progress.

[-] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world 19 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Several million young prospective voters were prevented from voting by going to college in states that don't allow out of state resident voting and not being able to vote in their home states on a Tuesday.

Add the fact that colleges are typically critically underserved when it comes to voting infrastructure, leading to a requirement to stand in line for the equivalent of a full-time job working day and it's clear that it's not young people being too apathetic.

It's politicians ratfucking them almost as much as they ratfuck people of color and people of color have much better get out the vote infrastructure to counteract it than colleges do.

[-] gothicdecadence@lemm.ee 1 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

I was young and voted for Bernie

Now I'm old and tired of this shit 😔

[-] SCB@lemmy.world -5 points 10 months ago

He was nowhere close to even contesting the primary. He got blown out by 3 million votes.

[-] Drinvictus@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 10 months ago

I didn't say he was close. My comment is basically a wish, kind of a "what could have been" situation.

[-] SCB@lemmy.world -1 points 10 months ago

Ah ok. Thought it was another "Bernie got robbed" thing.

[-] PopcornTin@lemmy.world 0 points 10 months ago

That's the thing. He wasn't going to beat Hillary in 2016. Yet, the Party took it in their hands to hurt him, give Hilary questions to debates, etc. It has always been that way. If you aren't with the Party, you won't get on their ballot.

this post was submitted on 19 Nov 2023
669 points (97.2% liked)

politics

18852 readers
4207 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS