24
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] linearchaos@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

No, that's absolutely incorrect. You want a new fake fingerprint every single time someone asks your browser for your information. You want it to lie about your plugins, user agent, your fonts and your screen size. Bonus if you use common values, but not necessary.

The randomized data they're providing isn't static and it isn't the same from session to session.

100% White noise is a far better obfuscation than a 40% non-unique tracking ID. Yes, your data is lumped in with 47 million other users, but used in conjunction with static pieces of your data you become uncomfortably identifiable.

[-] ryannathans@aussie.zone 11 points 1 year ago

The whole point of the poster above is that you can't ramdomise 100%

[-] WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world 8 points 11 months ago

Yeah... I don't know why a bunch of privacy bros think they know better than the CS and cryptography PhD's of the Tor project; the most advanced and complex privacy and anonymity preserving project in computing history.

[-] privacybro@lemmy.ninja 0 points 1 year ago

this is the correct answer

this post was submitted on 20 Nov 2023
24 points (61.5% liked)

Privacy

31949 readers
604 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

Chat rooms

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS