37
I Finished Starfield
(hexbear.net)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 23 Nov 2023
37 points (100.0% liked)
Games
21202 readers
153 users here now
Tabletop, DnD, board games, and minecraft. Also Animal Crossing.
Rules
- No racism, sexism, ableism, homophobia, or transphobia. Don't care if it's ironic don't post comments or content like that here.
- Mark spoilers
- No bad mouthing sonic games here :no-copyright:
- No gamers allowed :soviet-huff:
- No squabbling or petty arguments here. Remember to disengage and respect others choice to do so when an argument gets too much
- Anti-Edelgard von Hresvelg trolling will result in an immediate ban from c/games and submitted to the site administrators for review. :silly-liberator:
founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
I bought it at launch because eh Bethesda rpg, played through the first mission on my built-for-VR desktop, and it performed so terribly that I uninstalled it and got a refund from Steam.
But then I thought, well shit my computer should be able to handle the low settings of a 2023 release. I turned everything off and it still ran worse than any other game I've played. My processor was the limiting factor in my build so I replaced that and the motherboard to fit it.
Now I've got a computer ready for it, a pirated copy that I can probably patch, and I just play Dwarf Fortress because I can have 200 dwarves now. Things go monkey at 200 dwarves. Stanfield sucks.
The performance truly is astonishingly bad. My rig's not fantastic, just running a 2060, but I could get Baldur's Gate 3 and Armored Core 6 looking good while still almost always hitting 60fps. Starfield struggled to get above 30 in most places even on low.