[-] happybadger@hexbear.net 9 points 6 hours ago

Mutual Aid: a Factor of Evolution

[-] happybadger@hexbear.net 26 points 1 day ago

He's a self-made king.

[-] happybadger@hexbear.net 50 points 1 day ago

Monarchists are the most depraved kind of right-winger. You shouldn't legally be allowed to walk around in skin looking like a human if you're a monarchist. Your neighbours should be able to tar you and cover you in golden retriever fur.

127

spoilerLONDON — King Charles III's monarchy is set to receive a pay rise of more than 45 million pounds ($60 million), with a 53% jump in its official annual income, accounts show, as Britain grapples with a spiraling cost of living crisis.

The Sovereign Grant, the mechanism used to fund royal spending, will rise from over 86 million pounds ($110 million) in 2024-25 to around 132 million pounds ($170 million) in 2025-26, because of a surge in profits from the Crown Estate, a vast collection of land and property across the U.K.

Funded by the taxpayer, the Sovereign Grant is used to support the official duties of the monarch and other costs such as official travel, thousands of engagements, staff for working royals and the maintenance of occupied palaces.

It is based on a proportion of profits from the Crown Estate, which is independently run and has assets worth billions of pounds, including some of London’s most expensive real estate.

A separate report from the Crown Estate on Wednesday showed that it had generated profits of 1.1 billion pounds, or $1.4 billion.

The Sovereign Grant is funded by the taxpayer in exchange for the king’s surrender of the revenue from the Crown Estate. The royal household had been receiving 25% of the Crown Estate’s profits until it was agreed last year that the funding would be cut to 12%.

But it will still receive a significant boost in funding for 2025-26, largely due to Crown Estate profits. The report said it had seen a “year of record results driven by decades of investment in offshore wind, combined with a diverse and resilient property and land portfolio.”

Part of the funding increase will help finance the final stages of a 10-year, 369 million pound ($475 million) “reservicing” of Buckingham Palace, a project that is now in its eighth year, said the annual report about the Sovereign Grant, published Tuesday.

The king also installed solar panels at Windsor Castle and increased the use of sustainable aviation fuel for royal flights. The royal household will take delivery of two new helicopters in the coming year to replace aging aircraft, it said, noting that their use was a “key component of delivering engagements by His Majesty, as Head of Nation, and other members of the Royal Family.”

The grant is reviewed every five years, and is expected to next be reviewed through legislation in 2026-27 to keep funding for the royal family at an “appropriate” level.

In addition, the king receives income via the Privy Purse from the Duchy of Lancaster, a landed estate, while the Prince of Wales receives the net profits from the Duchy of Cornwall.

Both are independently audited, according to a research briefing on the finances of the monarchy published last week on the British House of Commons Library’s website. It added that the king also receives private income from investments and inherited wealth, which is not made public, leading some critics to suggest that royal finances are “shrouded in fog.”

While there is no legal obligation for the king to pay taxes, the British monarch, previously the late Queen Elizabeth II, and their heir has voluntarily paid income tax since 1993 on income from the duchies and earnings from personal investments, the research briefing said.

Around 600,000 pounds ($775,275) from the sovereign grant for the year 2023-24 was spent on the king’s coronation and events surrounding the historic moment, according to the breakdown of finances in the report, which spans a difficult 12 months for the royal family, when both Charles and Kate, the Princess of Wales, were diagnosed with cancer.

News of the monarchy's expected funding increase nonetheless drew backlash on social media, with Kevin Maguire, the associate editor of the left-leaning tabloid The Mirror, saying on X that there was "no cost of living squeeze for indulged King Charles."

“The Monarchy is a ripoff. King Charles getting £45m richer off backs of British people in midst of foodbanks, spiraling cost of living crisis, broken NHS, deepening child poverty etc is morally bankrupt & disgusting,” author Shola Mos-Shogbamimu said in a post on X.

For years, Britain has been plagued by a spiraling cost-of-living crisis, with real wages flatlining for a decade, leaving the U.K.'s average salary at just £29,669, or $38,000, as prices for utilities and food have soared.

Government figures show 30% of children are growing up in poverty and Britain has the worst rate of homelessness in the developed world, according to the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development.

The economy and inflation were among the top issues fueling the Labour Party's landslide victory in a general election this month, ending the Conservative government's 14-year rule.

Graham Smith, who leads the anti-monarchy campaign group Republic, in a statement drew a comparison with Ireland’s head of state, President Michael Higgins, who he said came at “a fraction of the cost for someone doing a similar job,” but was “elected and accountable to do it.”

“We do not owe the royals a living, we do not owe them palatial homes, private helicopter travel or lives of leisure and luxury,” he said.

[-] happybadger@hexbear.net 6 points 1 day ago

They're hard to watch. It takes a good 20 minutes of sitting there in silence before their curiosity outweighs their anxiety and they start popping up. It's such a big contrast to our yellow-bellied marmot population that has more or less the same ecological niche. It's a shame we can't do anything to protect their habitat since it's above the treeline and everything up there takes way longer to grow.

[-] happybadger@hexbear.net 30 points 1 day ago

Dog-eating sex offender has thoughts about who should be exiled from society.

[-] happybadger@hexbear.net 3 points 1 day ago

It's in an urban Colorado park.

[-] happybadger@hexbear.net 10 points 1 day ago

Pika are so cute. They live above 12k'/3650m in the mountains here and you can hear the colonies chirp when you pass by. Their fur is so well-insulating that climate change raising local temperatures slightly will wipe out the entire population.

37

This park is really coming together as 21st century design. Large community garden, apple/plum/cherry orchard, and three pollinator gardens that I'm expanding across areas where foot traffic isn't high. There are still big areas of Kentucky bluegrass to redevelop, but lots of resources being poured into rewilding.

[-] happybadger@hexbear.net 3 points 1 day ago

Warhammer 40k?

[-] happybadger@hexbear.net 12 points 2 days ago

surprised-pika-messed-up another anticommunist is a CIA shill?

I did enjoy Weapons of the Weak and Seeing Like a State though. Good books even if the latter is very heavy with its anarchism.

28

Absolute baby

[-] happybadger@hexbear.net 40 points 2 days ago

Chief Tami Sleeman of the Hancock police said the incident was one of three involving the 22-year-old suspect last weekend. He also used a shovel to destroy the windows of a parked truck with a sticker supporting Mr. Trump, the chief said, and vandalized the tires of a parked vehicle that had a sticker supporting law enforcement

If Aaron Sorkin wrote Falling Down

47

Solidify your legacy as a two term president, Sir.

85
submitted 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) by happybadger@hexbear.net to c/earth@hexbear.net

Fishers I think, or maybe minks. There were three in total living in the rocks below this one.

35
:meemaw-verynormal: (hexbear.net)
40

My Neighbour Totoro: Cul-de-sac at War Part IV, which promises ALL of the neighbours on screen AT ONCE in an EPIC battle to save humanity and property values.

107

dog piece, gun piece, monster truck piece. That's just today.

29
29

https://archive.is/wip/wRgDf

Yeah, i see how governments can do a Faustian bargain where they allow foreign capital to colonize their country. Sounds great on paper, you got 2 million peasants who suffer, let their foreign money create jobs. But then suddenly you have 2 million factory workers who own nothing they produce. You can't put the genie back in the bottle so that those people instead own those businesses without going to war. Instead, if you take your time, and don't employ foreign capital (debt doesnt count tho), you can instead grow your business owning class. I think its better that they "oppress" themselves, rather than be oppressed by foreign powers. it aint colonial capital oppression if its Columbian on Columbian. Do I know what I'm talking about? probably not. But i do feel that I'm growing wiser.

How has V3 helped you understand political theory?

Edit: That feel when PB when you think youre Capitalist

77
This is Mr. Pickles (hexbear.net)

He's so calm. Walked right up to me and demanded belly time.

19

You always liked gray colors? You love panels? Khrushchyovka is your favourite building of all time? Fear not, I present to you the ADVANCED version of Khrushchyovka, still gray and ugly, but now it can be up to 25 stories and up to a kilometer long. When Leonid Brezhnev came to power, he decided to build on the work of his predecessor and continue to erect identical panel houses on the whole territory of the Soviet Union. Nowadays a panel Brezhnevka is the most common type of building you can find in Russia. Let's talk about them and about how they were about to build a whole culture of doomers around themselves.

00:00 - Brezhnevka as a background of our everyday life

04:55 - Khrushchyovka and Brezhnevka - are there any differences?

07:13 - Common problems with Brezhnevkas

10:25 - Different types of Brezhnevkas

"Brezhnevki" (colloquial, by analogy with Stalinkas and Khrushchevkas) is the name of the series of houses built in the Soviet Union from the mid-1960s to the late 1980s, mostly during the era of Leonid Brezhnev. In the late 1950s, ‘One flat per family’ became, by decree, a priority for the communist party and its first secretary, Nikita Khrushchev. Leonid Brezhnev, who came after Khrushchev, disagreed with him on many things. But still decided to continue the practice of building low-cost residential panel buildings on a grand scale. The early "Brezhnevkas" are basically the same Khrushchevkas, made of the same panel blocks, only higher. While Khrushchev buildings had a maximum of 5 stories, under Brezhnev they began to build houses of 9 stories and higher. Buildings were constructed panel by panel out of standard elements manufactured by the factories, The panels would then be transported from the house factories (usually located near the construction sites of the new districts) and assembled in situ. The reason for the launch of the Brezhnevkas was the growth of the population's complaints about the quality of housing in USSR. The delight of getting their own "Khrushchevka" flat gradually dissipated, and eventually a compromise was found - the "Brezhnevka". In fact, "Brezhnevka" is the arithmetic average of two diametrically opposed principles and objectives of urban development: "deteriorated Stalinka" or "improved Khrushchevka". Upgraded variants of the systems developed in the former USSR are still in use, housing millions of urbanites to this day.

Hey there. Somehow you found my video and decided to watch it. So let me introduce myself. I'm Sergei and I'm from Russia. My channel is about my native country. I want to tell English-speaking viewers about the real Russia, about its past and present. Unfortunately, you can find a lot of propaganda about Russia on the Internet, both from the Russian media and from the Western ones. I want to tell you about Russia, as it really is, the country in which I was born, grew up, and lived all my life.

view more: next ›

happybadger

joined 3 years ago