17
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by dgerard@awful.systems to c/sneerclub@awful.systems
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] anyhow2503@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago

Explaining why it's bad doesn't really excuse it.

No, but it does explain it. There's nothing to excuse in the complete abscence of any promises.

I also explained why it's not all bad, so unless you have semi-recently used a desktop environment that tries to be accessible instead of catering to power users, then maybe you wouldn't dismiss my comment with an unrelated rant about Darktable's UI and C-nile Unix greybeards reordering their modules every couple minutes. Believe me, I understand the frustration of nearly every app UI being a thoughtless mess, but you're acting like big-FOSS sold you Linux™ - the Desktop OS under the pretense of it being an accessible interface for even the most casual computer user.

I can rant all day too about Windows UI design inconsistencies if you want, like the most basic settings being split across 2-3 different generations of UI design in 2-3 separate levels of "basic" to "advanced" which you navigate to by clicking really inconspicuous blue lines of text, which are randomly placed on the bottom of a dialog page or in a sidebar to the right.

[-] gerikson@awful.systems 4 points 1 year ago

My experience is with whatever Gnome-centered desktop ships with Ubuntu. It's on a headless box that I shut off today for ¤reasons, so I have no clue what it's called.

And thank god I am hale and hearty and sighted and a nerd, and it's not my daily driver, so I have not yet been cut to ribbons on the sharp edges. I do however have a blind partner, whom I know better than to try to impose Linux on. Her daily experience with the shit webdev/mobdev pumps out daily is not good, so yeah, there's plenty of blame to go around.

[-] anyhow2503@lemmy.world -3 points 1 year ago

My experience is with whatever Gnome-centered desktop ships with Ubuntu. It's on a headless box that I shut off today for ¤reasons, so I have no clue what it's called.

I have no idea what Canonical calls it either. It's basically just a skin that makes Gnome look a bit more shit as far as I can tell.

Her daily experience with the shit webdev/mobdev pumps out daily is not good

I thought this was about C-niles, but apparently all mobile and web devs are shit as well. I'm sure that random mobile and web apps are somehow very relevant to Linux DEs being accessible or not, but since you already "know better", there's no need to discuss this further really.

[-] gerikson@awful.systems 4 points 1 year ago

Accessibility is shit everywhere, much like Linux reply guys apparently.

[-] self@awful.systems 3 points 1 year ago

behind almost every shit linux design decision, there’s a handful of reply guys with nothing but the time and energy to defend it to the death, to the detriment of everyone involved

this post was submitted on 21 Nov 2023
17 points (100.0% liked)

SneerClub

983 readers
20 users here now

Hurling ordure at the TREACLES, especially those closely related to LessWrong.

AI-Industrial-Complex grift is fine as long as it sufficiently relates to the AI doom from the TREACLES. (Though TechTakes may be more suitable.)

This is sneer club, not debate club. Unless it's amusing debate.

[Especially don't debate the race scientists, if any sneak in - we ban and delete them as unsuitable for the server.]

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS