495
submitted 1 year ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world

These countries tried everything from cash to patriotic calls to duty to reverse drastically declining birth rates. It didn’t work.

If history is any guide, none of this will work: No matter what governments do to convince them to procreate, people around the world are having fewer and fewer kids.

In the US, the birth rate has been falling since the Great Recession, dropping almost 23 percent between 2007 and 2022. Today, the average American woman has about 1.6 children, down from three in 1950, and significantly below the “replacement rate” of 2.1 children needed to sustain a stable population. In Italy, 12 people now die for every seven babies born. In South Korea, the birth rate is down to 0.81 children per woman. In China, after decades of a strictly enforced one-child policy, the population is shrinking for the first time since the 1960s. In Taiwan, the birth rate stands at 0.87.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Rediphile@lemmy.ca 19 points 11 months ago

Good. Lowering the birth rate at the global scale = more resources per person.

[-] hungryphrog@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 11 months ago

I agree with you, but also what are we going to do when there are a ton of old people who need to be taken care of, and there aren't enough young people to take care of them?

[-] Rediphile@lemmy.ca 12 points 11 months ago

They will suffer. And I'm willing to be among them as it's worth it long term. The alternative of infinite growth isn't a realistic possibility in a world with finite resources.

[-] Dragon_Titan@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago

Should get interesting as capitalism infinity profit model begins to buckle under its own weight.

[-] BaardFigur@lemmy.world -1 points 11 months ago

You will also suffer, as the old people woild be a severe drain of resources

[-] SmoothIsFast@citizensgaming.com 4 points 11 months ago

You realize you are talking to an older individual, right? And us younger people would also deal with suffering to support a brighter future for our descendents.

[-] kromem@lemmy.world 7 points 11 months ago

You'll see AI stepping in on a lot of areas where there's decreased labor supply.

And a bonus for when you are old - AI is going to be far less likely to secretly be a sadistic fuck going into an industry with a vulnerable population in order to torture you when you have dementia and can't tell anyone about the regular abuse.

You'd be surprised at how often that kind of stuff happens when "young people take care of old people."

[-] Ataraxia@sh.itjust.works 3 points 11 months ago

We also have that problem and you don't fix it by making more furore old people. That's what AI is for.

[-] soggy_kitty@sopuli.xyz 2 points 11 months ago

We can kill ourselves. Honestly you think the world wont be on fire for other reasons by then? Lol

[-] CurlyMoustache@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago

Ættestup 👌

[-] nutsack@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago

for a little while.

this post was submitted on 28 Nov 2023
495 points (97.0% liked)

News

23360 readers
1595 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS