25
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] froztbyte@awful.systems 5 points 1 year ago

He's the one cultist who actually accomplished something

[-] Hanabie@sh.itjust.works -3 points 1 year ago

Exactly. I wonder if people really didn't get what I was saying ๐Ÿ˜„

[-] blakestacey@awful.systems 6 points 1 year ago

I couldn't tell what you were saying. Answering "yes" to the question of whether you were writing "in sarcasm or support" is not at all informative.

[-] Hanabie@sh.itjust.works -1 points 1 year ago

It means it was meant to be sarcastic and supportive. I thought answering "yes" to an "or" question is familiar to most people on the internet these days.

[-] Shitgenstein1@awful.systems 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

tbh, one thing I'm tired of from the internet, is exactly the post-ironic conflation of "just kinding but also sincerely" as wit. It's actually quite old (mid-late 2000's) and frequently a vehicle for the most vile views on the internet. And it's not clever.

load more comments (18 replies)
load more comments (18 replies)
load more comments (18 replies)
this post was submitted on 29 Nov 2023
25 points (100.0% liked)

SneerClub

1003 readers
1 users here now

Hurling ordure at the TREACLES, especially those closely related to LessWrong.

AI-Industrial-Complex grift is fine as long as it sufficiently relates to the AI doom from the TREACLES. (Though TechTakes may be more suitable.)

This is sneer club, not debate club. Unless it's amusing debate.

[Especially don't debate the race scientists, if any sneak in - we ban and delete them as unsuitable for the server.]

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS