62
Gaza conflict embroils Game Awards
(www.axios.com)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 01 Dec 2023
62 points (81.0% liked)
Games
16742 readers
792 users here now
Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)
Posts.
- News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
- Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
- No humor/memes etc..
- No affiliate links
- No advertising.
- No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
- No self promotion.
- No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
- No politics.
Comments.
- No personal attacks.
- Obey instance rules.
- No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
- Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.
My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.
Other communities:
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
Did they? They voted on a resolution that affirms Israel's right to exist. Can you show the part of the resolution that conflates anti-zionism with antisemitism?
I'm not arguing for the resolution or anything, I just don't see what you see.
Reaffirming Israel's right to exist is the literal Zionism.
https://www.congress.gov/118/crec/2023/11/28/169/195/CREC-2023-11-28-pt1-PgH5923.pdf
Wait, so then I say I'm in favor of a secular, dual-ethnic combined state where Israelis and Palestinians live together in peace under a common democratic government, I'm an anti-Smite?
Correct. Anything other than full-throated support of the current Israeli government is anti-semitic now.
Nope! The state of Israel exists in opposition to that notion. A combined state will likely never happen if it is a continuance of the current state. As what you proposed existed before Britain's control of Palestine and before the forced creation of the state of Israel in 1948, broadly put. Jews, Muslims, and Christians of all shades lived there simultaneously without conflict. Then US and European powers decided to meddle and create the ethnostate. Hard to walk back from being an ethnostate.
But my question wasn't about likelihood. I can still favor an outcome that's unlikely.
I would too, but I'd rather focus on outcomes that have a chance to exist. Cheers.
And as I said: I didn't ask which outcome is the most likely, I asked whether I'd be an anti-Semite based on that definition. I don't think I am but that definition makes me sound like I was one.
As I said, I do not believe you to be antisemitic based on that information. That would be absurd.