75
submitted 9 months ago by mp3@lemmy.ca to c/canada@lemmy.ca
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] cygnus@lemmy.ca 16 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

entertainment broadcaster

I think it's a safe bet that most Canadians consider CBC primarily a news organization. Either way, comparing their budget to organizations that can bill customers directly, like Parks Canada or Canada Post, is incredibly dishonest.

[-] Showroom7561@lemmy.ca -5 points 9 months ago

I think it’s a safe bet that most Canadians consider CBC primarily a news organization.

Maybe. Maybe not. The fact is, the CBC doesn't do only news, so we are funding their large entertainment wing, too.

Either way, comparing their budget to organizations that can bill customers directly is incredibly dishonest.

Well, CBC also has alternate revenue streams, including direct billing for their paid services (like Netflix or Disney).

What's dishonest is the CBC claiming that their News Network is not publicly funded.

[-] cygnus@lemmy.ca 8 points 9 months ago

I agree, that is dishonest. All CBC services should be free for all Canadians, even if that requires a larger budget.

[-] charles@lemmy.ca 6 points 9 months ago

If you read the article you linked, you'll see at the bottom that News Network is not allowed to receive public funds due to rules by the CRTC.

You'll also see that even the CBC acknowledges that News Network benefits from the other CBC services that do receive funds, but that it doesn't mean that News Network is publicly funded.

[-] Showroom7561@lemmy.ca -4 points 9 months ago

It quite literally says, "As such, while CBC News Network does not receive public funds directly, it does, in fact, operate using publicly-funded resources.".

We can split hairs, but they were not being very transparent or honest.

[-] girlfreddy@lemmy.ca 3 points 9 months ago

As such, while CBC News Network does not receive public funds directly, it does, in fact, operate using publicly-funded resources."

Seems pretty transparent and honest to me.

[-] Showroom7561@lemmy.ca -3 points 9 months ago

It would be if the CBC said it, but they didn't. They said the opposite. What I quoted was what the report uncovered.

[-] girlfreddy@lemmy.ca 3 points 9 months ago

I guess you can keep on whining then.

[-] villasv@lemmy.ca 4 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Maybe. Maybe not. The fact is, the CBC doesn’t do only news, so we are funding their large entertainment wing, too.

That's true. Out of curiosity, do you know how each branch fares in terms of income generation? Because it may very well be that their entertainment wing is helping subsidize the news part. - not saying this is the case, I don't know, just considering the possibility that cutting the entertainment part might make it harder to do the news part

Also, some of the entertainment also serves a social good purpose... not saying all of it, but definitely some of it. It's hard to really call the whole thing wasteful just because it's categorized as entertainment. Providing access to culture is one of the things that a broadcast corporation should be doing.

this post was submitted on 04 Dec 2023
75 points (100.0% liked)

Canada

7106 readers
269 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Communities


🍁 Meta


🗺️ Provinces / Territories


🏙️ Cities / Regions


🏒 SportsHockey

Football (NFL)

  • List of All Teams: unknown

Football (CFL)

  • List of All Teams: unknown

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


💻 Universities


💵 Finance / Shopping


🗣️ Politics


🍁 Social & Culture


Rules

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage:

https://lemmy.ca


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS