169
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 07 Dec 2023
169 points (96.2% liked)
Privacy
32024 readers
1176 users here now
A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.
Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.
In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.
Some Rules
- Posting a link to a website containing tracking isn't great, if contents of the website are behind a paywall maybe copy them into the post
- Don't promote proprietary software
- Try to keep things on topic
- If you have a question, please try searching for previous discussions, maybe it has already been answered
- Reposts are fine, but should have at least a couple of weeks in between so that the post can reach a new audience
- Be nice :)
Related communities
Chat rooms
-
[Matrix/Element]Dead
much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)
founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
Self-sovereign identity, with granular information sharing, and good encryption/signing support. I want to:
There's a fair amount of almost solutions, and except for blockchain, nostr has most of the necessary structure. What's missing is a NIP for an identity/profile data format standard, and a spec for data handling. But mainly, apps that make it easy to use, to publish, to verify and validate, and to authorize.
I'm sick of having hundreds of distinct identites scattered around the internet. Having the option to be anonymous or a distinct persona is important, but it shouldn't be necessary every time, and I should always be the owner of that identity.
As usual the blockchain really adds nothing to your proposal. Just allow people to host it on a random web server, there is no reason to have a centralized component at all for this.
Do you understand how blockchains work? I ask to gauge whether you have technical solutions for the problems blockchains solve, or are repeating criticisms of cryptocurrency you've read online.
Yes, I understand how blockchains work and that is exactly why I know that they never add anything. They literally solve no problem.
Blockchains only really "work" if they are part of a community so huge that nobody external can easily add 50%+1 nodes to the network or so useless that nobody would want to spend the money on that. But if you have huge blockchains they are totally impractical to store on every single device which wants to interact with them. Add to that the extremely long delay before anything is added to the blockchain and you can be sure that the longest surviving chain actually includes that block and the (with proof of work) huge waste of energy or (with proof of stake) bias towards people who already have a stake in the chain and you will quickly figure out that blockchain is never the best and in many cases not even any solution. Not to mention how many blockchain proponents think data written to the blockchain magically solves the problem that you need to verify that the data you write to the blockchain is actually accurate (e.g. with all those proposals to use it for proof of origins of products and similar things).
There is a reason all the major blockchains actually in use soon add a layer of services that interact with the blockchain for you and then actually doesn't interact for every transaction. They are all working around the inherent flaws in the technology.
What you're describing is a public ledger, and specifically how Bitcoin and Bitcoin-like, works; you aren't describing limitations of blockchain. Check out AWS's qldb for a non-cryptocoin blockchain db. Now, describe an implementation (in non-technical terms, if desired) that provides the features but that isn't a blockchain.