171
Elon Musk restores X account of conspiracy theorist Alex Jones
(abcnews.go.com)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 10 Dec 2023
171 points (91.3% liked)
News
23305 readers
3665 users here now
Welcome to the News community!
Rules:
1. Be civil
Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.
2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.
Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.
3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.
Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.
5. Only recent news is allowed.
Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.
6. All posts must be news articles.
No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.
7. No duplicate posts.
If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.
8. Misinformation is prohibited.
Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.
9. No link shorteners.
The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.
10. Don't copy entire article in your post body
For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
Because the passengers don't know where the aircraft is.
So for instance Musk might say "Gwynne Shotwell needs to fly to Austin on my jet on July 1." Shotwell says "I'll fly out of XXX airport". Then in June, Musk flies to YYY airport.
They aren't going to call Shotwell before her flight and say, "Turns out the plane just landed very close to you. Do you mind flying out of YYY instead to save us some fuel?" They simply reposition the plane.
So in other words, it's to be convenient to Elon and his cohorts. Which is what I said earlier. I'm not sure why you think that's justifiable.
It's justified because this is how professional pilots are expected to operate. Passengers are not supposed to deal with the logistics of their transportation.
For that matter, it's also how car-sharing is expected to operate. Imagine you took an Uber to your hotel, and the driver said "Hey, my next fare is two blocks from your hotel. So how about I drop you off there, it's just a five minute walk the rest of the way. Plus, it would save me from driving with no passenger for a few minutes, thus wasting fuel."
I think the vast majority of us would consider this unprofessional and respond, "No thanks, drive me all the way to my hotel". Which is why Uber drivers don't actually discuss their next fare with their current passenger.
Are you saying Elon and Yaccarino don't have limousines that can just drive them to the airport? Instead it's necessary to pollute more?
I'm sure they have limos. Their limo driver is told, "Meet A at B street and bring them to XXX airport by Y pm."
It would be very unprofessional for the pilot to call the driver at the last minute and say, "Change of plans, now you bring them to ZZZ airport, it's a little further away which means you'll have to leave T minutes sooner". Depending on their schedule, A might not even be able to leave T minutes sooner.
We live in a society where staying on schedule is valued way more than reducing carbon emissions. Another thought experiment: you are 30 minutes late to work. Your boss demands an explanation. You say, "I have a very good explanation, today I decided to bike to work instead of drive". That's probably not going to be good enough. You are expected to emit CO2 whenever it's necessary to stay on schedule.
Once again, this sounds like justifying pollution for the convenience of the rich.
It's not just the rich. It's everyone who takes a car to work instead of bike, it's everyone who takes an Uber or even a bus instead of walking a mile, it's everyone who demands that stores open on time and packages are delivered on time.
It's hypocritical to hold Musk to a standard that nobody else meets.
None of those are anywhere near as polluting as jet fuel. Which has lead in it.
It's still justifying pollution for your convenience. And a lot more CO2 has been emitted for the convenience of people who aren't rich.
If you live in the US, you are responsible for 3-10X the emissions of people in other countries. You can't justify that by pointing to Musk.
I see, so I can't criticize Musk for adding lead to the atmosphere for his personal convenience because I have a carbon footprint.
Logical.
Singling someone out for criticism when you do the same is the definition of hypocrisy.
But... I don't do the same. I don't put lead into the atmosphere.
You've never flown on a commercial aircraft? Or bought anything that was transported by air?
Are you saying those aircraft wouldn't have flown if I didn't specifically do those things? Because otherwise, again, not the same.
If that's the standard, then Musk is not responsible either. His aircraft would have flown even if he never purchased it.
Yes, that's very comparable. 🙄