151
submitted 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) by Zerush@lemmy.ml to c/privacy@lemmy.ml
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Septimaeus@infosec.pub 2 points 10 months ago

That certainly would make the data smuggling easier. What about battery though? I assume that requires inference and at least rudimentary processing.

How would a background process do this in real time on a mobile device without leaving traceable evidence like cpu time?

[-] steveman_ha@lemmy.world 6 points 10 months ago

What if its not streaming? What if its just cached for future access, e.g. next time the user opens the app (and network traffic spikes anyways) maybe?

[-] Mossheart@lemmy.ca 3 points 10 months ago

Or plugs in their phone at night, bypassing energy use concerns?

[-] Septimaeus@infosec.pub 3 points 10 months ago

That’s possible too, and in general I’d think a foreground application currently in use alleviates most of the technical restrictions mentioned (read: why we never install FB).

But again we must assume some uncommon device privileges and we still haven’t solved the problem of background energy usage required to record and/or process a real time feed.

[-] BigPotato@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago

Cox also sells home automation bundles which advertise "smart" features like voice recognition which are always plugged into the wall.

[-] BrownTree33@lemmy.ml 2 points 10 months ago

Can it be implemented on pc? They often turned on and people speak around them too. Cpu activity much harder to trace when there are a lot of different processes. Someone can blame their phone, while it listening pc near by.

[-] Septimaeus@infosec.pub 4 points 10 months ago

Yeah outside mobile devices I imagine there’s a lot more leeway technically speaking. I’d be far more inclined to suspect a smart TV or a home assistant appliance like Amazon Echo, for example. And certainly there are plenty of PCs out there that are 100% compromised.

But it’s the phone that people often think of as eavesdropping on their conversations. The idea is stickier perhaps because it’s a more personal violation. And I wouldn’t put it past data brokers by any means. They would if they could. I’ve just yet to hear a feasible explanation of how they can without being caught. Hence my doubt.

this post was submitted on 23 Dec 2023
151 points (90.4% liked)

Privacy

31995 readers
662 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

Chat rooms

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS