604
Consumption rule (sh.itjust.works)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] nurple@lemmy.world 30 points 11 months ago

I agree with that statement, but I also don’t know how to define where the line is where consumption turns into overconsumption. Any ideas?

[-] not_that_guy05@lemmy.world 30 points 11 months ago

People buying every shoe color in order to match all the time? I don't mean like 3-6 pairs.

[-] Sheeple@lemmy.world 14 points 11 months ago

Wait people need more than 6 pairs???

I'm god damn shoe obsessed and I don't have that many. I got:

-Sports shoes

-Work shoes (thick, leather, sturdy)

-Fancy boots (black)

-Fancy boots (white)

The only boots I ever got purely to match was the two pairs of black and white fancy boots. Which is more than enough to be complimentary to any wardrobe depending on if I use brighter or darker colors. What more could you need? Two pairs of sports shoes? Two pairs of work shoes if you wanna be extra? But even that only brings you up to 6 and I can't fathom needing more.

Like I consider myself a shoe obsessed woman. I pride myself in my silly little stompers yet I can't imagine owning more then 6 at a time. Unless you count during my lifetime because yeah boots got replaced as old ones wore out. I needed to replace the white ones as they literally fell apart, went through several rounds of work and sports shoes too.

[-] nurple@lemmy.world 11 points 11 months ago

Depending on what sorts of stuff you're into there are situations where you can go over six without it being absurd. Like:

  • Everyday walkaround shoes
  • Running shoes
  • Hiking boots
  • Black dress shoes
  • Other color dress shoes
  • Sandals of some kind

That's already six pairs without even getting into other things that one may need like rain boots, snow boots, cleats, nonslips for work, etc.

[-] QueriesQueried@sh.itjust.works 4 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

And without getting into the varieties of hiking/trail running/etc. You can easily encounter situations in that genre alone that necessitate 2 or more. Waterproof or not, trail running vs hiking vs thruhiking, the list goes on and on.

Editting to add: this isn't unique to hiking either, you'd find similar variations in runners too. Endurance, sprint, or agility (among others) running are all different enough you'd have genuine performance and health reasons to separate the shoes. Obviously hardly anyone will dedicate to that many unique activities, but some people really enjoy them so it's worth explaining.

[-] not_that_guy05@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

I've seen men and women have boxes of shoes filling their small closet. It's a weird thing to see and then explaining is no different. Everybody has their drug, if you know what I mean.

[-] nurple@lemmy.world 11 points 11 months ago

Apparently I own 13 pairs of shoes. Damn.

I used to be way more consumer-y and I've been slowly reforming my ways. Case in point, two of those pairs are old running shoes repurposed into general beaters, and 10 of them were purchased 5+ years ago.

[-] ahriboy@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 11 months ago

I have sizes 47 and 48 pairs of shoes. Not used as it was very large for my feet, which is technically 44-45 when I received shoes that belonged to my late American uncle in September.

[-] Daxtron2@startrek.website 1 points 11 months ago

I own sneakers, sandals, and boots. What else would I need?

[-] catch22@startrek.website 8 points 11 months ago

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Planned_economy

Unfortunately, people being cunts, this is very open to corruption by pretty power hungry authoritarians. But probably the only viable solution.

this post was submitted on 24 Dec 2023
604 points (100.0% liked)

196

16511 readers
2667 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.

Rule: You must post before you leave.

^other^ ^rules^

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS