39

I’m finally moving my selfhosting experiments from a VPS to a physical machine in my house but, since I don’t have a static IP address, I opted to use the dynamic dns service offered by Cloudflare.

On their official website I’ve seen suggested ddclient but I haven’t find that much information on which labels should I add to set it up. Therefore, I’ve also found this docker image that seems pretty clean and easy to set up, but the video talking about it was of 3 years ago and I’ve seen that the github repository has been archived last year…

Which option (not necessarily among the two above) do you prefer to set up your Dynamic DNS with Cloudflare? (I don’t know if this can be an important information to add or not, but the Linux server I’m using is running NixOS)

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] cypherpunks@lemmy.ml 5 points 11 months ago

screenshot of Wargames computer saying "A strange game. The only winning move is not to play"

cloudflare is an intelligence company who's flagship product involves them mitming your TLS.

why bother self-hosting, if you do it from behind cloudflare?

[-] Lord_ToRA@lemmy.world 7 points 11 months ago

Because it provides an extra layer of protection at no cost and makes DNS management very convenient, as well as other free features.

[-] Nyfure@kbin.social -1 points 11 months ago

Convenience will kill the cat

[-] shaked_coffee@feddit.it 2 points 11 months ago

That's why I didn't want to use Cloudflare Tunnels, but just Dynamic DNS. I though that they had access to the stuff you transfer only if you use their tunneling feature and for the reasons you said is something I would prefer to avoid.

The thing is that I bought my domain on Infomaniak and most of the self-hosting tutorials I've seen recommend Cloudflare. Would you suggest something different?

[-] shaked_coffee@feddit.it 1 points 11 months ago

EDIT: I just realized that ddclient (that I was already considering to set up ddns with cloudflare) also supports Infomaniak directly! (I don’t know how before making this post I didn’t saw it 😅) So I’ll probably go for that way in order to cut out Cloudflare from the equation and rely on one external company less. Thank you :)

[-] qaz@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago

Because I don’t want to expose my home IP.

[-] iquaanyin@mastodon.social 0 points 11 months ago
[-] cypherpunks@lemmy.ml 7 points 11 months ago

cloudflare's service puts them in the middle - so, HTTPS doesn't encrypt traffic between the browser and your server anymore, but instead between the browser and CF, and then (separately) between CF and your server. CF is an antidote to intelligence agencies' problem of losing visibility when most of the web switched to HTTPS a decade ago.

[-] Lord_ToRA@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago

CF is an antidote to intelligence agencies' problem of losing visibility when most of the web switched to HTTPS a decade ago.

This is a claim that will need evidence backing it up.

this post was submitted on 24 Dec 2023
39 points (93.3% liked)

Selfhosted

40359 readers
295 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

  1. Be civil: we're here to support and learn from one another. Insults won't be tolerated. Flame wars are frowned upon.

  2. No spam posting.

  3. Posts have to be centered around self-hosting. There are other communities for discussing hardware or home computing. If it's not obvious why your post topic revolves around selfhosting, please include details to make it clear.

  4. Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or github here. Just post the link for folks to click.

  5. Submission headline should match the article title (don’t cherry-pick information from the title to fit your agenda).

  6. No trolling.

Resources:

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS