This discourse was going around twitter today apparently and im curious takes from here.
Which is it for you?
For me i prefer playersexuality. I want to be able to romance any romance option regardless of my charachters gender. I dont want to be stuck with only Arcade Gannon if i want to do m/m
I agree that sexuality can be important to a charachter. But if you wanna do that, seems like the charachter can just not be a romance option.
That said. In RPGs devs can do what they want. You want a charachter to be monosexual and a romance option, have at it. (Unless theyre all straight, then fuck you).
I do kinda hate what The Sims did by adding monosexuality. Felt like such a virtue signal that made the game less fun. All Sims being pansexual was always more fun for me. Especially since i usually play that game as a pansexual slut. Unless i decide my player Sim is mono, but thats on the player's end.
Monosexual townies in the Sims should at least be optional (is it? Idk havent played Sims 4 since this update).
I see that your army didn't have galeforce on every character then haha
Nowi gets to sit on the bench until she learns to put a shirt on.
I gotta get my Nah from somewhere.
But should it be Gregor because he's closest to her age? Or Rickon, because he looks closest?
Maybe I should minmax to avoid that problem. Which man makes the best Nah?
Henry because he passes down his white hair. Other than that, idk, I don't use the kid characters much.
Ah ok i was talking about the kids mostly when i said i didnt bother with minmaxing