82
submitted 10 months ago by NightOwl@lemmy.ca to c/worldnews@lemmy.ml

Archive: [ https://archive.is/GH7WP ]

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] owenfromcanada@lemmy.world 32 points 10 months ago

My theory is that people naturally want things they can't have. For the wealthiest people, there aren't many things that are elusive. Epstein provided a venue to access something that wasn't easy to get, something exclusive.

The other thing is how huge amounts of money affect a person's mind. In order to justify hoarding that much wealth, you have to ignore the humanity of other people. And if other people (especially those without wealth) don't mean anything, it's easy enough to justify the abhorrent things they've done to them.

Wealth hoarding is bad for everyone, including the hoarders.

[-] magnetosphere@kbin.social 11 points 10 months ago

After just reading the first paragraph, I was thinking “categorizing children as ‘something you can’t have’ is still too extreme”, but then you went on to explain dehumanizing others. Together, that makes the best explanation I’ve seen!

[-] Catoblepas@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 10 months ago

Absolutely, and wealthy people having less empathy is something that can be seen in studies.

this post was submitted on 04 Jan 2024
82 points (94.6% liked)

World News

32359 readers
322 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS