242

This is a cross post with shit just works, check both instances out!

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Vilian@lemmy.ca 26 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

but the russian human defence could work?

[-] theodewere@kbin.social 20 points 1 year ago

further testing to commence in Spring

[-] setsneedtofeed@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

I am skeptical.

[-] neidu2@feddit.nl 5 points 1 year ago

Yes. Statistics indicate that 270000 Unexplosive Unreactive Armyguys provide a slight survivability chance to the t72.

[-] Aqarius@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

Honestly, as defence against a weapon with a range of about 100m, a bunch of guys with guns and a higher vantage point would do the job.

[-] vexikron@lemmy.zip 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

As a sort of most horrifying and most ludicrous means possible of population control of the operating force employing this tactic anywhere near frontlines, or in areas that do not have air defence suitable to stop drones or aircraft, yes.

As a means of stopping anything that would not otherwise be stopped by the vehicle's armor, no.

Unless it turns out the vehicle is actually made of aluminum instead of steel. Then... maybe yes for 50 cal rounds coming from beyond about a kilometer, maybe less.

this post was submitted on 14 Jan 2024
242 points (96.5% liked)

NonCredibleDefense

3755 readers
55 users here now

Rules:

  1. Posts must abide by lemmy.world terms and conditions
  2. No spam or soliciting for money.
  3. No racism or other bigotry allowed.
  4. Obviously nothing illegal.

If you see these please report them.

Related communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS