388
submitted 8 months ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/politics@lemmy.world

President Biden and other senior U.S. officials are becoming increasingly frustrated with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and his rejection of most of the administration's recent requests related to the war in Gaza, four U.S. officials with direct knowledge of the issue told Axios.

Why it matters: Since the Oct. 7 Hamas attack 100 days ago, Biden has given Israel his full backing, with unprecedented military and diplomatic support, even while taking a political hit from part of his base in an election year. That support has largely continued publicly, but behind the scenes, there are growing signs that Biden is losing his patience, the U.S. officials said.

  • "The situation sucks and we are stuck. The president's patience is running out," one U.S. official told Axios.
  • "At every juncture, Netanyahu has given Biden the finger," Sen. Chris Van Hollen (D-Md.), who has been in close contact with U.S. officials about the war, told Axios. "They are pleading with the Netanyahu coalition, but getting slapped in the face over and over again."

Behind the scenes: Biden hasn't spoken to Netanyahu in the 20 days since a tense Dec. 23 call, which a frustrated Biden ended with the words: "This conversation is over." They had spoken almost every other day in the first two months of the war.

  • Before Biden hung up, Netanyahu had rejected his request that Israel release the Palestinian tax revenues it's withholding.
  • National Security Council spokesperson John Kirby tried to downplay the decrease in communication, telling reporters on Wednesday that "it doesn't say anything" about the state of the relationship.
  • But more and more signs of irritation are emerging. "There is immense frustration," a U.S. official said.
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] K1nsey6@lemmy.world 108 points 8 months ago

Its fully within his power to pull 100% of the money Israel receives from the US and cut off all access to weapons. He has chosen not to.

[-] Badeendje@lemmy.world 34 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

It sure it. But then, the most powerful kingmaker in the US is AIPAC, if they withdraw their support of Biden, he will struggle in the presidential race.

Then the risk of a xenophobic wannabe dictator getting elected is put on the otherside of the scale.

So if you look at this from a purely US point of view. The tradeoff is brown people half a world away die, vs the US becoming trumplandia with all the vengeance he has promised to bestow on his political rivals.

So if it was your choice, what would you chose?

Edit to clarify: yes it's bizarre US allows PACs, corporations should not be treated as people, the situation is FUBAR.

[-] goferking0@lemmy.sdf.org 11 points 8 months ago

Almost like money needs to get taken out of politics but not like those who use it to keep their people in power will let that happen

[-] Badeendje@lemmy.world 5 points 8 months ago

Our views align on the solution and the hurdles.

It saddens me that there is no young version of Senator Sanders, he would be good for the US.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] K1nsey6@lemmy.world 10 points 8 months ago

I vote for no one needlessly dying anywhere.

[-] OutlierBlue@lemmy.ca 22 points 8 months ago

If Trump wins a lot of people will die, just like last time.

load more comments (40 replies)
[-] Badeendje@lemmy.world 7 points 8 months ago

Sure, I would too if it where in the table as an option. But alas, it seems it is not. I would venture a guess to say that the Biden administration would also take that option if it where available... But it seems to be a quagmire of unreasonable actors.

[-] randon31415@lemmy.world 7 points 8 months ago

People are going to look back in AIPAC and wonder... how AI got a political action committee before chatgtp 6.0 passed the Turning test.

[-] Maggoty@lemmy.world 3 points 8 months ago

Ow. I laughed tho

[-] crusa187@lemmy.ml 2 points 8 months ago

Biden’s approval rating is 33%. AIPAC is of no consequence here - no incumbent in the history of US Federal elections has ever won with such abysmal polls in an election year. Not once, ever. Biden isn’t going to magically make history here, and his ego telling him he has to do 2 terms instead of allowing for a primary election so democracy can play out is the reason why.

Then he has the audacity to claim democracy is on the line this year. It’s already gone, America is just in denial about it.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] Xtallll@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 8 months ago

Israel wasn't popular with the other countries in the region before October, most of it's neighbors have called for it's destruction, US support is basically what keeps them in check.

[-] K1nsey6@lemmy.world 2 points 8 months ago

Israel is not popular in the region BECAUSE of the US.

[-] Linkerbaan@lemmy.world 9 points 8 months ago

False. Israel isn't popular in the region because of israel.

[-] lledrtx@lemmy.world 2 points 8 months ago

Israel is not popular in the region because the others are extremely antisemitic. Let's stop pretending like the others are saints, please?

[-] K1nsey6@lemmy.world 4 points 8 months ago

An old Zionist lie, conflate opposition to zionism with antisemitism

[-] assassin_aragorn@lemmy.world 2 points 8 months ago

Nah the Houthis do seem pretty antisemitic, straight up.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)

Im no historian but i figured Israel wasn't popular in the region because the country of irael used to be the country of Palestine until another country decided to put israel there. I bet Egypt hated having a lot of its territory held for a long time as well after that one war but like i said I'm no history doctor

[-] S_204@lemm.ee 1 points 8 months ago

There's never been a country of Palestine, but you're right about not being a historian.....

[-] the_post_of_tom_joad@sh.itjust.works 2 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

There’s never been a country of Palestine

damn, really? Why did something like a million people get displaced when israels borders for drawn in 1950 or whatever? I can't remember the details. Why did all those people get forced from their homes?

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] Furedadmins@lemmy.world 2 points 8 months ago

More like the US is not popular in the region because of Israel.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
this post was submitted on 15 Jan 2024
388 points (96.0% liked)

politics

18883 readers
3317 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS